Speculation of 070905

Consider a cylinder which is almost full of water. Now we use a rubber tube to rotate the water either clockwisely or anti-clockwisely. Then we observe a phenomena that Einstein claim to have his own explanation: the water near the external surface of the cylinder rise up, while the water close to center of radius fall down, thus forming a cone with the surface of water. As we all understand, centripetal force only provide axial acceleration, which acting only only the plane parallel to the bottom of cylinder, then why does the water fall progressively downward as it approach the center of radius?
Einstein's explanation is that when we stir the water, the whole universe is helping in centrifugal the water, therefore we would see the water become cone shape. I consider this explanation to be wrong and inadequate.
The reason I consider this explanation to be wrong is because one of the principle states that the mass of Cosmo is approximately evenly distributed, therefore the attraction force of the Cosmo in any direction of the cylinder is even. The net force acting on an object must therefore be zero. If anyone bother to go through the Mathematics of that(classical mechanics), you will be certain that the water in the cylinder should NO behave in this way. Moreover, this presuppose that this phenomena would not happen in the middle of the Cosmo, which I consider is against common sense.
My hypothesis of this phenomena has something to do with gravity. The gravity has been diluted near the exterior of the cylinder, while gravity has increased near the center of radius. I consider this phenomena may also model the action of gravity: Gravity essentially cause spiraling of nearby ether by continuously providing a clockwise/ anti-clockwise torque to it. In here I consider this phenomena is literally equivalent to the phenomena of gravity. So gravity, at its heart, is a rotational motion we interpret as linear. i.e. mechanic of rotational kinetic maybe a better description of it.
In accordance to my hypothesis, anti-gravity is thus an equal torque acting on the space/ether which has identical strength but opposite direction of action. Interestingly, whether we rotate clockwise or anti-clockwise, the center always go downward, and we can only deconstruct a spiral locally by providing the torque in opposite direction to local action.
This surely an inspiration to some, an non-sense to other.

Innovation at 07.07.2005

8. Yet another way to produce motion in an electrical car: Instead of using electricity to drive the wheel, we could use the repulsive/attraction force between charges/Magnetic Polarity to indirectly produce rotation in the wheel. It is a much more effective way of utilize electricity since theoretically the repulsion and attraction force does NOT take away any electrical/Magnetic energy from the source(unlike existing method directly use electrical energy against friction), thus dramatically cut down the energy expenditure per km. So now it doesn’t require a large battery.
9. Drilled a spiral tunnel from the bottom to the surface of a solid. Gentle place the bottom into a fluid, you will then see it is slowly rotating in the process of sinking. The general concept is to use the alignment of space inside a solid to direct fluid to the place so the reaction force would move the solid in the way we desired. Obviously, we extracted energy from the liquid via interaction with the solid, so we don’t need external energy to sustain its motion. Now imagine if engrave the surface into appropriate form, what will happen? The liquid is pushing itself into motion with its own energy!

Euler-Alex Cylindrical Paradox

Euler-Alex Cylindrical Paradox. Suppose we have a big vertically
placed hollow cylindrical object with spiral engraving on the surface.
The Spiral paint a trajectory from a point at the top rim of this
object to another point at the bottom of this object. Now we place a
metal ball of a small size that could fit the width of this spiral on
the starting position of the spiral on the top of this object and
release it. Naturally, gravity would pull this object downward. Do the
Math now.
Now the potential energy is Mass * Height * g, assume the ball is
rotating with constant speed, the kinetic energy is centripetal Force
* Distance= Mass* Velocity^2 / Radius* Number of Circle from top to
bottom(n)* 2* Pi* Radius (We assume the Spiral is approximate equal to
the length of a circle, however, the perimeter of this ellipse should
be GREATER than a circle), which we could rewritten to 2* Mass *
Velocity^2* Pi* n. And in textbook Physics we assume all the kinetic
energy is coming from the Gravity, therefore:
Mass * Height * g=Mass * Velocity^2 *n *Pi or
Height* g= Mass* Velocity^2 * n* Pi
Are they TRULY equal each other? It is impossible Mathematically
since the value of n is arbitrary! Theoretically it could equal to any
amount we want it to be. Of course, the result still await experiment
verification.
My prediction is no amount of experiment would prove this equation
right since it is WRONG theoretically. The reason?
Our assumption is wrong because we omit something very important:
The attraction force between the cylindrical object and the metal ball
which PROVIDE the energy which transform an otherwise free fall into
circular motion. It doesn't matter what material the ball and the
cylindrical object are made of, as long as the spiral trajectory could
keep the ball rolling. We just use Gravitation Energy to Lead Out this
non-obvious energy. The amount of energy lead out depend on the
geometry of the trajectory, has nothing to do with the mass of the
rolling object.
To complete the Paradox, suppose we have a way to transfer the
kinetic energy into other energy, and storing that energy. Then we use
that energy to rise the ball from bottom to the top. However, the
amount of energy is more than adequate to do that. The energy input is
LESS than energy output!
To increase the level of challenge, we could change this rolling
ball into a Magnets, and place coil vertically inside the cylindrical
object. Use the electrical energy produce to move the magnetic from
destination to starting point. Since it is inconceivable that the
rolling Magnet would slow down, we have a very simple Generator which
extract energy from Magnetic Field, Molecular Attraction and
Gravitational Field at the same time. Now Output is far greater than
input.
To increase the level if challenge further, now we use what the
rolling Magnetic to somehow power a Generator of the design in 1. The
Output to Input ratio could be of ANY number we wanted to (greater
than 1).
We start with every working Physics theory to arrive at a result no
conventional Physicist would accept.
I challenge any Physicist to prove me wrong, or to nominate me for
the Nobel Prize on Physics for theorizing on Perpetual Motion Machine.

My fluid dynamic idea

Now I approach this issue with a slightly different angle: Instead of
preventing the phenomena of air dragging, we utilize and control how
this object drag the air layer of its surrounding. How?
By making a spiral trajectory on the surface this object. Instead of
making the surface as smooth as possible, we carefully engrave the
surface of this object to form a path of least resistant in the shape
of spiral. Now when this object is moving forward, the layers of air
in the surrounding is NOT moving along with it, the air is flowing
according to the graving on the surface. As the air layer is rotating
with the object in the central, this circular motion would NOT in any
way slow down the forward action of the object. We would have a near
zero air friction in an ordinary environment.
The tenet of this concept is to CONTROL the air flow surrounding an
flying object by using GRAVING to provide a LEAST RESISTANT pathway.
In this implementation, the goal is simply to reduce air friction.
However, we could extend this concept in two directions:
1. Use the graving in combination of the motion of this object to
MANIPULATE the flow of air. We could essentially create a storm u
2. Use the graving in the combination of motion of this object to
MANIPULATE the flow of air, which in turn CHANGING the air pressure in
a way that favor the motion of this object.