如何去拆散一粒電子?

這篇文章提到的科學原理其實和上一篇相差不遠，既然可以用快速的電磁場變化來把原子最外層的電子拆走，要是我們用此方法在一粒電子上，則同理電子會感應電磁場而自轉，當電磁場快速的由一極變化到相反的一極時，我們就可以不用超長的圓形軌道就可以做電子內部結構的研究，當然先決條件是可以把電子由原子中拆出來，然後再以此方法處理。當然亦要用到我的發明。

如何拆散一個原子?

這是朋友發明的自己清潔換水器帶給我的靈感，他以為最清潔的洗衣服方法不是單一方向不停轉而寄望於水流和衣服的磨擦，反而應是一個方向旋轉一會，形成轉動慣性後再向另一方向旋動，如此一來就有兩部的轉心力把污蹟沖走(但不可以用現行的馬達，因為如此會大大縮短它的壽命，要重新設計)。我之前也用英文發表過類似的想法應用在把原子電離化上面，因為電子是以一定的軌跡繞着核心轉動，而和電子轉動的方向的平均累加形成了原子的磁場，因此如果用強大的電磁場先引導所有電子向一個方向旋轉，然後忽然用另一個相反的電磁場先引導所有電子向相反方向旋轉，於是原子的最外層電子便有可能因為離心力比電子和質子的吸引力還要強而被扯離原子，於是我們便可以很方便的把原子離子化。但關鍵是目前任何的電磁線圈都有一定的電磁慣性，不可即時不單退磁，更可以轉到另一方向，所以就要應用我的新發明了。

More thoughts on Electrical Generation Process

According to my last hypothesis here, external magnetic flux passing through an atom would increase or decrease the rotational speed of outlying electrons of the atom. The original idea is not seeing magnetic flux as powerful enough to accelerate and decelerate the rotational speed of electrons in their orbit; it is about increase or decrease the speed of spinning of the electrons. However, then we would face the question of how does the increase and decrease of the speed of spinning of the electrons related to electrons escaped from the control of atomic nucleus; so I adopt an easy way: Taking the analogy of roundabout almost literally. What if we adopt the original thought, how could we explain the phenomena of electrical generation through metallic atoms exposed to variable magnetic field?
That would a bit more explanation than the roundabout analogy. As we observed that almost everything in the universe posses both spin and rotational momentum around another objects. Take the example of Earth, it is rotating about the sun and spinning at the same time. My thought is the spinning of Earth is coherent with the rotation of Earth about the Sun. Could we imagine what happen if we place a sphere in the edge roundabout, and the roundabout start spinning? The sphere would rotate about the central of the roundabout as well as spinning. Now what if we applied a large torque to increase/decrease the spinning of the sphere? Due to the inertia of the sphere, there would be some resistance about the sudden change of state of motion. This resistance maybe the root cause of Lenz’s Law: That the conservation of angular momentum of electrons would act against the increase/decrease of the speed of spinning of electrons. Now what happen if that change is large enough? The sphere would fly off from the roundabout just like projectile.
Taking this analogy back to atoms. As we applied a strong magnetic flux through it, the outlying electrons would increase/decrease the speed of spinning in the same direction which it enter. In the case which the outlying electrons increase the speed of spinning, there may exists an upper limit of how much increase per unit of time could be tolerate in each orbit, therefore those increase in a rate greater than this limit would have more than enough kinetic energy to stay in the orbit. Similarly, which the outlying electrons decrease the speed of spinning, there may exists an upper limit of how much decrease per unit of time could be tolerate in each orbit, therefore those increase in a rate greater than this limit would have less than enough kinetic energy to stay in the orbit. In both cases, the spin of electrons are thus become asynchronous/incoherent. with it rotation around the nucleus. Therefore some outlying electrons may detach from the atoms if the change is large enough in an instant. What we should said is the probability of outlying electrons detaching from the atom is directly correlate to the amount of change of both strength and polarity of external magnetic flux per unit of time. Those electrons which run-away from the control of nucleus is how generator are capable of generating electrical current.
Now if we go back to the original hypothesis, and thinking in the light of Einstein’s discovery of the rules beneath photoelectric effect. We could see how similar are the phenomena Photoelectric effect and electrical generation due to Lenz’s Law, so it would be legitimate to ask the following question: Since there exists an optimal way to emit electrons out of the metal, shouldn’t there also exists an optimal pattern of change of magnetic flux to eject electrons from metallic atom in the process of Electrical Generation Process? Is that why we would we have the relationship between Voltage, Current and Resistance? Taken these two phenomena as literally identical, would we see the change of magnetic field as identical to photons hitting the metallic atoms? How far we can take this analogy? What is the similarity and dissimilarity between the two phenomena?

An experiment on the Atomic Nucleus

According to my experiment on electrons proposal, we may observe interesting effect on the electrons itself if we applied a variable magnetic flux to the electrons. Since we could understand that the outlying electrons are further from the nucleus which require less escaping kinetic energy supplied by the Magnetic field, what would happen if we applied the same idea into the atomic Nucleus? As we all understand, the atomic nucleus are packed with protons which carry identical charges, thus the electrostatic repulsion force is very powerful within such a short distance are somehow neutralized by nuclear forces and possibly electromagnetic attraction forces withing the nuclear. Therefore it is reasonable to expect that would be easier to extract proton out of the atomic nucleus then extracting electrons out of the atom. As we already seen phenomena of proton ejected out of the atomic nucleus through nuclear decay; therefore theoretically we could use magnetic field to increase and decrease the rate of nuclear decay.

A Question on electromagnetic inductance

When we magnetize an electromagnetic coil, it is often that we magnetize more than the electromagnetic coil itself. If we magnetize an electromagnetic coil nearby some iron sheets, theoretically we also require extra electrical energy to magnetize those iron sheets. In a sense, all ferromagnetic material in the universe would have to be magnetize, therefore it should be impossible to magnetize any electromagnetic coil. How could we magnetize any electromagnetic coil? Another question is, does the presence of iron not attached to the coil increase or decrease the inductance of the electromagnetic coil? If it increase the inductance then it would take longer for the electromagnetic coil to magnetize; if it decrease the inductance then it would take shorter time for the electromagnetic coil to be magnetize. So does it take longer or shorter with the presence of ferromagnetic materials? How does the presence of ferromagnetic material in surrounding environment increase/decrease the inductance of the electromagnetic coil?