如何去拆散一粒電子?

這篇文章提到的科學原理其實和上一篇相差不遠，既然可以用快速的電磁場變化來把原子最外層的電子拆走，要是我們用此方法在一粒電子上，則同理電子會感應電磁場而自轉，當電磁場快速的由一極變化到相反的一極時，我們就可以不用超長的圓形軌道就可以做電子內部結構的研究，當然先決條件是可以把電子由原子中拆出來，然後再以此方法處理。當然亦要用到我的發明。

如何拆散一個原子?

這是朋友發明的自己清潔換水器帶給我的靈感，他以為最清潔的洗衣服方法不是單一方向不停轉而寄望於水流和衣服的磨擦，反而應是一個方向旋轉一會，形成轉動慣性後再向另一方向旋動，如此一來就有兩部的轉心力把污蹟沖走(但不可以用現行的馬達，因為如此會大大縮短它的壽命，要重新設計)。我之前也用英文發表過類似的想法應用在把原子電離化上面，因為電子是以一定的軌跡繞着核心轉動，而和電子轉動的方向的平均累加形成了原子的磁場，因此如果用強大的電磁場先引導所有電子向一個方向旋轉，然後忽然用另一個相反的電磁場先引導所有電子向相反方向旋轉，於是原子的最外層電子便有可能因為離心力比電子和質子的吸引力還要強而被扯離原子，於是我們便可以很方便的把原子離子化。但關鍵是目前任何的電磁線圈都有一定的電磁慣性，不可即時不單退磁，更可以轉到另一方向，所以就要應用我的新發明了。

Why Euler's Coil must have 4 coils as minimum?

That is for two ‘waves’ from the source electromagnetic coil to be merge in each electromagnetic coils, which may produce an effect similar to that of Parallel Path Effect.

Yet another idea on Euler's Coil

Consider a standard Euler's Coil technology with 4 independent electromagnetic coils. What happen if the electromagnetic coils is connected as 2 pairs? i.e. When A,B,C,D is arranged in a square, A and C act as a pair while B and D act as another pair? Since we are connecting the electromagnetic coil in series, the result would be different from when all of them are independent. Moreover, what if we switch the connection of the electromagnetic coil from parallel to series in the middle of experiment according to the states of electromagnetic coils?

A Question on the difference of Electrical and Magnetic field

Why that in the Parallel Path Effect which two magnetic flux merge in a conducting material to produce a stronger magnetic field, while we haven't heard of two electrical flux merge in a conducting material to produce a stronger electrical field? Does it have anything to do with Magnetism being the tendency for electron to spin?

Question of today on nature of Magnetism

Does the brittle nature of Permanent Magnet has anything to do with its unlimited supply of Magnetic energy? i.e. Does the mechanism/structure which provide the Magnet which unlimited Magnetic energy is what make the Magnet brittle?

More thoughts on Electrical Generation Process

According to my last hypothesis here, external magnetic flux passing through an atom would increase or decrease the rotational speed of outlying electrons of the atom. The original idea is not seeing magnetic flux as powerful enough to accelerate and decelerate the rotational speed of electrons in their orbit; it is about increase or decrease the speed of spinning of the electrons. However, then we would face the question of how does the increase and decrease of the speed of spinning of the electrons related to electrons escaped from the control of atomic nucleus; so I adopt an easy way: Taking the analogy of roundabout almost literally. What if we adopt the original thought, how could we explain the phenomena of electrical generation through metallic atoms exposed to variable magnetic field?
That would a bit more explanation than the roundabout analogy. As we observed that almost everything in the universe posses both spin and rotational momentum around another objects. Take the example of Earth, it is rotating about the sun and spinning at the same time. My thought is the spinning of Earth is coherent with the rotation of Earth about the Sun. Could we imagine what happen if we place a sphere in the edge roundabout, and the roundabout start spinning? The sphere would rotate about the central of the roundabout as well as spinning. Now what if we applied a large torque to increase/decrease the spinning of the sphere? Due to the inertia of the sphere, there would be some resistance about the sudden change of state of motion. This resistance maybe the root cause of Lenz’s Law: That the conservation of angular momentum of electrons would act against the increase/decrease of the speed of spinning of electrons. Now what happen if that change is large enough? The sphere would fly off from the roundabout just like projectile.
Taking this analogy back to atoms. As we applied a strong magnetic flux through it, the outlying electrons would increase/decrease the speed of spinning in the same direction which it enter. In the case which the outlying electrons increase the speed of spinning, there may exists an upper limit of how much increase per unit of time could be tolerate in each orbit, therefore those increase in a rate greater than this limit would have more than enough kinetic energy to stay in the orbit. Similarly, which the outlying electrons decrease the speed of spinning, there may exists an upper limit of how much decrease per unit of time could be tolerate in each orbit, therefore those increase in a rate greater than this limit would have less than enough kinetic energy to stay in the orbit. In both cases, the spin of electrons are thus become asynchronous/incoherent. with it rotation around the nucleus. Therefore some outlying electrons may detach from the atoms if the change is large enough in an instant. What we should said is the probability of outlying electrons detaching from the atom is directly correlate to the amount of change of both strength and polarity of external magnetic flux per unit of time. Those electrons which run-away from the control of nucleus is how generator are capable of generating electrical current.
Now if we go back to the original hypothesis, and thinking in the light of Einstein’s discovery of the rules beneath photoelectric effect. We could see how similar are the phenomena Photoelectric effect and electrical generation due to Lenz’s Law, so it would be legitimate to ask the following question: Since there exists an optimal way to emit electrons out of the metal, shouldn’t there also exists an optimal pattern of change of magnetic flux to eject electrons from metallic atom in the process of Electrical Generation Process? Is that why we would we have the relationship between Voltage, Current and Resistance? Taken these two phenomena as literally identical, would we see the change of magnetic field as identical to photons hitting the metallic atoms? How far we can take this analogy? What is the similarity and dissimilarity between the two phenomena?

The theory of Rotational Relativity

The theory of Rotational Relativity deal with a more common phenomena than Einstein's theory of Relativity, since every object in the universe spin: From electrons to atom to planets to Milky way to galaxy. Therefore it is necessary to understand what effect would the spinning of other objects relative to the reference object.
In according to Einstein's paper on relativity applied in Electromagnetism, any object would experience a magnetic field generated by relative motion in accordance to Faraday's rule. Thus, since any objects in the universe is surrounded by other objects rotating relatively to it, therefore it would be as if the electrons bonded to atoms in these (non-conducting) rotating objects are rotating relative to the object. As a consequence, the object would experience magnetic flux of various strengths: Some are pointing upward as North, some are pointing downward as South… etc. Thus, if we are not in the center of universe, we should expect a net magnetic flux acting on each electron that depending on the position of: An Universal Magnetic field.

My general Theory on Electrical Generation

There is ONLY one method of electrical Generation taught in textbook: By variation of Magnetic field, we either vary the strength or density of the Magnetic flux. There are two ways to create the variation of Magnetic field, one is through varying the distance of a fixed source of Magnetic field emanating object, another is through varying the voltage and current of electrical current enter and exit an electromagnetic coil. Thus, in this sense, all electrical Generation is in its heart a disguised process of mutual induction. Thus understand the details of mutual induction is the key to understand the process of electrical generation. I am going give you my ’spring’ analogy of electrical generation here.
We could thought of Permanent Magnet as a spring. As generating coil approach it in the Generator, the spring is kicking the electrons in the generating coil to action. However, it doesn’t just kick once, it is the changing of the electromagnetic stress on the generating coil created electromotive force(emf). Due to the design of generating coil, those emf is able to formed electrical current to flow in the generating coil in such a way that formed magnetic poles in the generating coil. Using the spring analogy, the spring is hitting the space inside the generating coil, and to maintain its neutrality/balance of each point mass in the generating coil, the coil kicks back. However, the different between generating coils and magnets is that generating coil is soft in a sense that it doesn’t have a preference for the magnetic poles it formed; (Which maybe why it require variable electromagnetic stress of kicking of the electromagnetic spring is necessary to generate a steady supply of electricity.) while Magnet is a hard spring since its magnetic polarity can’t be change easily and require great amount of energy. If we apply Hook’s law on spring here, we can easily see the spring of magnet is continually stressed by the generating coil(due to identical polarity with the magnet it facing), and as result the magnet also react back to the generating coil. This stressing back and fro formed the main mechanism of electrical generation, and would experience by the rotator as retarding force. Electrical generation is possible due to the continue competition of two electromagnetic stresses (and the kinetic energy from outside that keep the rotator rotating.)
However, as every spring has its elastic limit, so do magnet has its upper limit of tolerance of identical magnetic polarity, we could expect there is an upper limit of the electrical energy produced by each generating coil before it broke the spring of the magnet(demagnetize it). Thus, in a sense, we are extracting the spring energy from each magnet in the electrical generation process. The amount and the nature of electrical energy is depending on the nature of the magnetic field from each magnet. It is essentially a mutual induction process of an object that has unchangeable voltage and current interacting with another object that has changeable voltage an current. Magnetic energy from the magnet is transform into electrical energy from this inexhaustible supply of magnetic energy. It is not a conversion process as stated in classic electromagnetism!
It is thus impossible to use only two electromagnetic coils to produce electricity since there is no way to for one coil to extract spring energy from the another coil, how to expect a ’soft’ spring react to another ’soft’ spring?