地磁的來由假說

這篇是翻譯自己以前寫了兩篇解釋地磁的來由，首先兩篇都是建基於相對論電磁學的根基，就是當兩個物件中的非自由電子在作相對的旋轉運動時，因為以各自的角度去看，對方的旋轉運動是和自己的旋轉方向相反，所以產生了相斥的電磁場，於是在地球上高速轉動的東西就會因此產生了浮力，此事已被實驗證實。只是因為這些停留在原子軌道電子本身也在做旋轉運動，而不是被完全固定，所以相對旋轉運動就不是工整的圓形，於是這個效應就相對較弱。

把這個原理應用在地球上，我的推想是地球核心有不少流動而含鐵離子的岩漿，一層層地繞箸地心轉動，由於液體黏力(viscosity)的緣故，所以最近地心這一層最快，距離地心愈遠就愈慢，所以每一層以地心為軸作旋轉運動的岩漿於轉動得最遲的地表而言都是向相反的方向作旋轉運動，所以層層累積的效應就形成了地磁南北極。

要驗証這假說，只要量度地球磁場強度是如何隨箸與地心距離愈少而減弱﹐是否合乎岩漿流動的相對速度及含鐵量，理論上當然是愈近地心，地磁愈來愈弱;另一個推論就是地磁應和地球自轉的方向有關，想像一個於真空旋轉的液體行星，要是沒有外來的力距，它的最外層會先向一個方向旋轉，慢慢遲下來再向另一方向旋轉，如此類推，但是由於能量守恆，旋轉的角動量必然愈來愈低，所以過往地球應有無數次地磁逆轉及地磁減弱的記錄，即地表剛誕生時應為最強，之後隨箸岩漿冷卻和凝固，相對旋轉運動愈來愈遲，最後完全凝固時失去地磁。

忘了最近寫這篇提出的新証據去證明地磁是和岩漿流動的流動模式有關，因為地球的南北磁極是每年都同步移動的，如果是由固態磁性物體而形成就解釋不了，而用地電的流動也有點牽強，所以我提出的假說最合乎目前已知的事實，只是人類目前的科技不足以驗明或否定我的假說。

Against Time as another Dimension in Physics

Einstein’s Theory hang on the notion that Time is independent from the 3 other dimensions such as x-coordinate, y-coordinate and z-coordinate. How independent is time from them? Are it independent from the other three in the same way them are independent from each other?

Length, width and Height are independent in the sense that any object make a change in one of them doesn’t necessary imply the change of other two. Thus any object in the universe can change only one out of the three dimension without changing the other two. There is no built-in causality chain in the definition of these 3 dimension themselves to connect the change of one dimension to change of another dimension. If there is any relationship between the change of them, that relationship is formed due to something not inherent in the dimensions themselves: Gravity. It is inherently and theoretically possible a change in one dimension doesn’t imply a change in another dimension. And this theoretical possibility has been verified many times in the universe(for instance, by light traveling in straight line which only 2 out of 3 dimensions varies). They are independent of each other Mathematically in the sense that one dimension doesn’t contain the other two functionally, and description of one doesn’t give us any information of the other two. It is a complete and adequate description by each of them without referring to other. Physically they are independent from each other, in the sense that in the existing model of universe, there are no theoretical necessity that change in one dimension must cause change in any other dimension.
Time, however, is defined by periodic change of position of planets. We recognize a year by the time it take for Earth to return to its angular position from the sun(which could be verified by observing the pattern of season in weather). If there is no observable regularity in the system, then time can never be defined. Thus the definition of time is inherently depends on other three dimension. To be more accurate, time is calculated from the change of other 3 dimensions, time is a function of other three. Thus time is Mathematically and Physically impossible to be separate from the other three. Time make no sense without an implicit reference to the other three, and it is causally related to the other three dimensions. Unless we could discover phenomena that time could be referred without any implicit reference to the other three, I am strongly against the usage of time as an independent dimension in discussion of Physics. Since it is an logical and practical impossibility in existing framework of Physics and Mathematics, therefore any theory implies time is vary independently of the other 3 dimension is invalid.(i.e. Theory of Relativity)
Why does human held the illusion that time as an independent dimension to be an inherent truth? It is because of our experience that biological process is irreversible(probably built-in in the blueprint of DNA), and has regularity that we can measure. That irreversibility come from physical measure of entropy resulted from complexity inherent in any biological entity. In a sense, Life is necessary for Time to exists.

The theory of Rotational Relativity

The theory of Rotational Relativity deal with a more common phenomena than Einstein's theory of Relativity, since every object in the universe spin: From electrons to atom to planets to Milky way to galaxy. Therefore it is necessary to understand what effect would the spinning of other objects relative to the reference object.
In according to Einstein's paper on relativity applied in Electromagnetism, any object would experience a magnetic field generated by relative motion in accordance to Faraday's rule. Thus, since any objects in the universe is surrounded by other objects rotating relatively to it, therefore it would be as if the electrons bonded to atoms in these (non-conducting) rotating objects are rotating relative to the object. As a consequence, the object would experience magnetic flux of various strengths: Some are pointing upward as North, some are pointing downward as South… etc. Thus, if we are not in the center of universe, we should expect a net magnetic flux acting on each electron that depending on the position of: An Universal Magnetic field.

Speculation of 070905

Consider a cylinder which is almost full of water. Now we use a rubber tube to rotate the water either clockwisely or anti-clockwisely. Then we observe a phenomena that Einstein claim to have his own explanation: the water near the external surface of the cylinder rise up, while the water close to center of radius fall down, thus forming a cone with the surface of water. As we all understand, centripetal force only provide axial acceleration, which acting only only the plane parallel to the bottom of cylinder, then why does the water fall progressively downward as it approach the center of radius?
Einstein's explanation is that when we stir the water, the whole universe is helping in centrifugal the water, therefore we would see the water become cone shape. I consider this explanation to be wrong and inadequate.
The reason I consider this explanation to be wrong is because one of the principle states that the mass of Cosmo is approximately evenly distributed, therefore the attraction force of the Cosmo in any direction of the cylinder is even. The net force acting on an object must therefore be zero. If anyone bother to go through the Mathematics of that(classical mechanics), you will be certain that the water in the cylinder should NO behave in this way. Moreover, this presuppose that this phenomena would not happen in the middle of the Cosmo, which I consider is against common sense.
My hypothesis of this phenomena has something to do with gravity. The gravity has been diluted near the exterior of the cylinder, while gravity has increased near the center of radius. I consider this phenomena may also model the action of gravity: Gravity essentially cause spiraling of nearby ether by continuously providing a clockwise/ anti-clockwise torque to it. In here I consider this phenomena is literally equivalent to the phenomena of gravity. So gravity, at its heart, is a rotational motion we interpret as linear. i.e. mechanic of rotational kinetic maybe a better description of it.
In accordance to my hypothesis, anti-gravity is thus an equal torque acting on the space/ether which has identical strength but opposite direction of action. Interestingly, whether we rotate clockwise or anti-clockwise, the center always go downward, and we can only deconstruct a spiral locally by providing the torque in opposite direction to local action.
This surely an inspiration to some, an non-sense to other.