賤男的多妻詩

我和你,是陽和陰,陽陰是太極的兩點,陰陽結合,天之經,地之義!
我、你、她,是三角形的三端,是最基本的圖形,亦是穩定的櫈的支架,一如神聖的三位一體;
一年有四季,因此三位女朋友加我一位就完整了,而且二儀生四象,是天地的基本單位。
五: 嘩!四位女朋友要了我的命,真受不了,不想了!

成人版七小福

(本文不適合任何者心智未成熟者觀看,後果自負!)

排第一的異能是透視眼,只可以看穿女性的衣服,最討厭的是被迫觀看醜婦的裸體,唯有用女人底褲擋眼;
排第二的異能是把陽具的大小長短轉換,保證所有女人滿意,最討厭是年紀大的怨婦,可用處女經血阻止;
排第三的異能是把身體縮少,專用來偷窺少女底褲,最討厭是肥妹,可用胸圍阻止;
排第四的異能是讀心術,專讀懷春少女的春情,伺機和她共赴巫山,但不可以控制少女的心思;
排第五的異能是入淫夢術,可以入任何女性的夢,和她翻雲覆雨,但最怕是被女性捉住逾時不歸,大傷元氣;
排第六的異能是淫字/畫術,可以令任何女性在看字或畫時中想入非非,產生陣陣紅暈,他可趁機輕薄;
排第七的異能是用手輕觸,即能令任何女性產生陣陣高潮,最怕是自己同時洩陽,失禮當場。

(只是人物介紹,以後的故事如何發展,看你們的了!務請列明出處!)

中產廣告一則

這應是十年前一則在電視的廣告了,它的對象是中產,賣的是位於名校區的一些樓房,大意是說為了下一代設想,快快搬入該樓房。因為住在該區的都是中或上等的社會階層,孩子不會接觸到下層人,可以快樂健康的成長。
原來在廣告商的想像中,所謂中產專業人仕,就是自絕於下層社會的人,孩子接觸到下層人仕,會污染他們的心靈,阻礙他們的成長。中產的特色就是潔廦,成長的 方式就是在被隔離的溫室生長,而專業就是用法律去壟斷某行業,使某社會階層成為世襲,不用接受太大的競爭。這是不是香港中產階級的意識形態反映?
我想到的是,用法律去壟斷某行業,使某社會階層成為世襲,付出的社會代價是減低社會各階級的流動性,間接損害自由經濟。另外,如此的中產階級是逃避了和佔 數量最大的下層接觸,其實不太利於在就業市場競爭,例如就不可能當經理等人事部職位,因為不懂下層的心態和行為;如果要經營生意的話,欠缺對社會各階層的 了解一定是致命毒藥;政治家就更不可能了。就是因為潔廦,而自困於某行業中不思進取,是不是它心目中最理想的中產生活?

物質主義的心理現實

香港式的物質至上主義其實在心理學上已經被證偽,因為不少研究指出,人的快樂並不是和物質的豐富程度直接掛釣,基本上,愈有錢愈快樂的說法並無具體事實證 明。而以整個國家為標準的研究,也反映不出物質的豐富程度和主觀的快樂感覺有什麼直接關係,其中最箸名的例子是亞洲窮國不丹,快樂指數是在世界上首屈一 指。其實,想一想,如果人的快樂並不是和物質的豐富程度直接掛釣,則我們可以推論出經濟繁榮國家的人民一定生活得比經濟落後國家的人民快樂(因此美國是世 界最快樂的國家!),而這個國家經濟繁榮的時侯,人民一定生活得比經濟蕭條時快樂。拿香港做例子,因為每年都有經濟增長,因此97年以後的香港一定比97 年前的香港快樂,但這顯然不是事實。
香港式的物質主義思想的最大問題是把心的運作物質化,一切以可以比較的數字來衡量,而又把心理運作過分簡化,心理運作之所以稱為心理,明顯因為它的運作是 多小獨立於物質層面之外。心理不是簡簡單單的運算及程式條件式: a:快樂, -a:不快樂,如果人的心理是如此簡單的話則人類亦不可以成為萬物之靈。我想問題是經濟學的思想未成熟,過份把人的行為簡化,而某些香港人,不想動 腦思考,因此便用一些最簡單的方式來運算來代替思考。
快樂的本質是什麼?我這裏只能猜想和腦神經的運作模式有關,但是這個運作模式亦是可以變的!

More thoughts on evolutionary theory

The hypothesis of Evolutionary theory is itself a tautology, it is a statement of simple Mathematical truth: Given anything that can reproduce itself, those who is more fitted for reproduction would have more ‘children’ then those who is less fitted. How can we tell the nature of reproductive fitness? We often do so by looking at the result of reproductive fitness itself, that certainly sound like a circular argument itself. The inherent difficulty of theory of evolution as a science is similar to History: Because we can’t do any historical experiment, and the question of external validity remain a headache for theory of evolution. It is difficult to exactly reproduce the historical condition when evolution happen, nor an experiment can be used to predict what has happened in the past.
Because evolution process had already happen, we simply can’t re-run the history to see what would happen otherwise, what we can do is to suggest the pathway which it may follow. However, there is always more than one pathway to arrive at the current result, therefore even if we manage to disprove one pathway doesn’t mean there is no way to get from here to there except by supernatural means. It is analogue to the idea of naturalism would can never disprove: How can anything beyond nature happened within the realm of nature? How to draw up an hypothesis or experiment that can give definite test to the theory of evolution itself? In what way we can disprove the process of evolution? In what way we can disprove tautology?

有沒有人打算投訴ICAC中聯辦干預選舉?

各位,

最近頭腦不是太清醒,已有兩、三天沒有看報紙。
這不是選舉結果不結果的問題,這是原則的問題, 一國兩制,中國共產黨明顯不是屬於香港的,而基本法中亦有指本地政治組織不可以和外國有政治聯繫(包括台灣,但台灣不是中國的一部份嗎?),何以中共自己 可以豁免於外?綜觀世界各地的法例,一律是明令禁示有外國經濟、政治勢力介入的,只要有嫌疑選舉就失效。為什麼香港可以忍受中共三番四次插手操縱香港的選 舉?是不是香港人天生賤格,喜歡民意被歪曲,喜歡被強姦?抑或是97年以後香港全面中共化,原則不原則不是問題?這是哪門兒的法治?
有趣/可憎的事,明報社論大 字標題反對,為什麼它不可以像上次陳冠希一案中主動投訴ICAC,查明事實真相,盡一盡知識份子的責任?抑或是如97年以來不 少知識份子一樣,只罵泛民主派不爭氣,自己卻一點行動都沒有?哪是門兒的知識份子?更可恨的是,此事在蘋果日報已是公開的秘密,明報亦是傳媒,它可不可能 今日才知道?如此的知識份子,如此的公民良心?

此致
一香港人

Euler: The feeling I had when I shake your hand

Shall I call you the dearest person whom I want to give you the prefix Ms. C,

The day before yesterday I am standing outside the school you studied, eager to give you flower which I never gave any female before. I have already evaluated all possible consequence, include which you would outright reject me and throw the flower in the rubbish bin, then surely it is an relieve to me for this seeming non-reproached ‘love affair’ for 10 months. 10 months, what kind of man am I that can endure 10 months of your indifference toward me, and what is the motivation that propel me for that long period of time?

Now, it would be very old-fashion to said that is because of your unusual beauty, extraordinary intelligence, vast knowledge in Philosophy and Psychology, and Devil’s body that could drive any man crazy. Although in Psychology of Love, one or any combinations of above four factor could made any man infatuate with you so much he delude himself that you are the one, while at the same time deny the logic to be applied to other attractive females. However, none of above applied to me in this case, which is why I am writing this to you. In terms of my ‘Choice Theory of Love’, I think choice of love object merely as a conscious decision later with many unconscious attempts for justification. Forgive my poor expressive power, what I embedded in the theory is that it only describe the love process between layman and laywoman, that is to be distinguish from my idea of True Love.

For me, it is necessary for the True Love to have the quality of uniqueness and exclusiveness that can not be established/defended by logic, which is a feeling only hearts with organismic trust can comprehend. That is the shocking feeling I have when I shake your hand, which can never be explain by logic, reason, neurology of sexual arousal and psychoanalysis. I am a man mature enough to distinguish between the feeling of sexual arousal, excitement and infatuation; yet that is a feeling that is simply indescribable by any means of words. It satisfy the uniqueness and exclusiveness criteria that you as my ‘a prior’. I dated several times before, but however intimate we got, it is never as so strong, intense and shocking as the feeling of shaking your to me. To me, it is like the feeling of ‘Being one with Universe’, ‘Atonement’ or the peak of male orgasm; which the only comparable experience I had before is when I meditate in 16 which resulted in my ‘End of the World’ prophecy. It is the second time in my life, I thereby immediately know for certain that you are my Princess White.

What a shame on me to wait until this day to reveal that to you. Right at the moment I am in contact with your hand and look you in the eye, I literally shocked out of my conscious. If memory serves you, you must remember that dazing look on my face, silence and my unusually inarticulate speech to you. I call tell you never in my life my tongue is so tangled like that in front of a female, whether that person is my girlfriend or not. That is very unnatural to me. I dig into myself hard for reasons which I can never found, none of the physiological or neurological or psychological reaction from me that can happen just like lightening. Remember I never have any idea of who you are before, it is simply impossible for me to rationalize what happen.

All I could remember is, at the exact moment that happen. It is like a lightening strike into my mind. I could only remember images, visions and thoughts rushing into my unconscious mind like tremble. It is literally so much that my conscious mind can not handle and shut itself off. So I get the vague sense that I am in a dream-like state, and see the world like it was through glass, and I literally lost my soul. The sense of time is completely distorted, there appears to be two parallel time sequences going on: One in line with the physical time, another is running at extremely slow. My conscious is blurred, is that what people call Transcendence or Oneness with Universal Mind?

Then it just getting curiously strange, as soon as I try to recollect the whole experience I forgot them all, it is like my unconscious mind is actively blocking me from analyze any of it. Imagine my state of puzzlement in whole day, so I am distracted from the slogan of demonstration and all that, I simply can’t take my mind of that feeling even until now. From the limited evidences I collected, my conclusion is that my unconscious somehow ‘recognize’ you and take immediate action to shadow my memory of it. So later I even have difficulties in recognizing your face. My unconscious mind later repress this memory and downplay its importance to me on my relationship with you. So, forgive me, there was a moment in time I think astrology, numerology, Chinese astrology is the just the trick to get me to be in bed with you. I don’t know what really behind my unceasing effort of writing over 200 emails to you in a month before you reject me, with the later emails which contain more than thirty thousand Chinese character, which is 90% of all Chinese I ever written. It consume me over 200 hours of effort and countless lost of sleep. I am really amaze that the level of self-deception that my mind can afford.

Likewise, I think it is illogical that you don’t share at least a bit of my feeling when we shake hands. So your rejection of me after 1 month become the target of my wrath, since I think your unconscious is also playing tricks on you. You may just suppress this raw, primitive and feeling from the deepest recess of your mind like me, or you are so much fond of playing psychological games with other that you get lost in your own mind. When I look at the photos in your blog, I immediately get the sense of you being ‘Lost, Lack of Direction in Life’. Let me be the one who save your soul, who give your new direction and meaning in life, who make your life a walk in the heaven.

I never said such thing to any other female and I will never do so in the future. That is my promise and my swear. I recognize from the earliest day that we are two of a kind, just that you love the feeling of being lost in love affairs. You intentionally or unconsciously deny yourself the distinction between sexual arousal, psychological effect elicited by well organized situation and symbolism; and the Reckoning of Soul. My soul am deeply hurt by your careless words, and live only by the Hopes steaming from the Love of you. Please let our soul joined together in everlasting union.

My confidence in you that it is not as unsubstantiated as my hope for your love, because I belief once we joined hands, you simply can’t deny the feeling come directly from your soul. So you can never resist me. Our union would mean the completion of the sequence of destruction of this sick old world, and the forces from our bond can build the Heaven on Earth for all human being. All that begin with meeting of you in 7.1. demonstration, and end with your wise decision to join me. Do you want to bet on this? You got nothing to lost, I am willing to bet my whole life and everything on you. Would you like to find out the validity of my hypothesis?

I feel sad for you when you habitually trivialize the great phenomena of love as a merely a combination of the four factors in psychology, or a delusion afforded by our DNA for the sake of propagation of human animal through neurological mechanism. Thus you are self-deceiving and comprise your intellectual integrity by giving the uniqueness and exclusiveness to where it’s not due. Deep in your mind, you recognize every male that you are interested are similar to other males working hard to impress you, you just deny yourself this knowledge. I am the solution to this dilemma you created. Love base itself not in logic and rationality but gut feeling. Can you still feel your heart? Can you remember all of your feeling toward me right at the moment we meet?

In strict accordance to my own principles, I never said the same word twice. You can keep this in anyway, anywhere in any form you desired. This is the written proof of love from me, and I waive all my right to any change of terms.

The one whom lost his soul for you,
then waiting for you to give him back
Someone who love to call your soulmate

To find common Divisor for any 2 number

There is a method commonly known for finding the greatest common divisor between any 2 number. It work like this:

75=36*2+3,

36=3*12

So 3 is greatest common divisor of 75 and 36.

Why does this work?

We could see 75=(3*12)*2+3=3*(12*2+1)

Suppose for any two different number, X and Y.

X=Y*M1+R1

Then repeat the process:

Y=R1*M2+R2, or X=(R1*M2+R2)*M1+R1=R1*M1*M2+R2*MI+R1

If R1=0 then the process is completed, we have Y=R1*M1*M2+R1=R1*(M1*M2+1), R1 is the common divisor for X and Y; If not,

R1=R2*M3+R3 or
X=(R2*M3+R3)*M1*M2+R2*MI+(R2*M3+R3)=R2*M1*M2*M3+R3*M1*M2+R2*MI
=R2*(M1*M2*M3+M1)+R3*M1*M2

If R3=0 then the process is completed, we have Y=R2*(M1*M2*M3+M1), R2 is the common divisor for X and Y; If not, we can continue the process indefinitely. Notice that the last term in the right will disappear eventually.

In layperson’s language, we first found out the remainder of the greater number divided by smaller number, then use the remainder to test whether the smaller number is a multiple of the remainder. If it is the case, then the common divisor is the remainder itself. If not, then we test the remainder of the smaller number as divided by the remainder in the last operation. If it is the case, then the common divisor is the remainder in this operation. So the idea is to keep looking for the common divisor in the remainder term until we found it.

依然是非常重要的話—我生存不可沒有你

前天買了花,然後送花,誰不知香港的中學到今天依然是用隔離的方法去「對付外人」,似乎任何中學都承繼了中國的內外有別文化。外面=壞,內面=好, 以同一年齡來算比我還聰明的人,怎麼會選了如此的一間「介備深嚴」的中學來讀?在互聯網無孔不入的時代,基督教去管教「學生」的方法,依然是走不出舊式保守思想的死胡同。或者真的該問一問校長,我送花給一名中七的女生如何可以在消費感情的時代背景下如何腐敗其他學生?他的心理學理據在哪兒,有什麼研究支持?有沒有想到如此銷國式管治對中學生的壞影響?在外國,朋友之間也可以送花,收花不一定要在床上見,如此的思維邏緝,到底我是在太平天國還是香港?
結果今天我買的是玫瑰花,和前天買的花躺在我家,和我的一樣等死。當然是等死,沒有希望的人生,在沒有未來的都市,由沒有未來的國家統治,這是任何頭腦清醒的人都可以想到的。我的性格不是妥協型,不過據說學校再發現我的話會記你的缺點。我會以為,愛到迷頭迷腦的時侯,還理如此荒謬的操行來乾什麼?你不是真的以為以品學兼優,升上大學會有前途?你不是沒有修經濟的,知不知道供求定律?再者,你為了小小的操行而不理制度背後的合理性,你又如何稱自己為無神論者?不再想了,否則我又打算變掛放棄你。
我想我不可以天天以如此的方式去想念你,因為如此一來,我不單生活有問題,快要連生存都有問題,收不到你的回應,飯不下嚥,吃不甘味。可能戀愛是保持身裁苗條的一好方法,昨天吃不下,前天又吃不下,今天連煮都免了。我是如此情緒化的人,今天的工作量是零,寫給你的信是例外。我慢慢明白為什麼你是如此喜歡「和稀泥」愛情,既不甜也不苦,最重要是可以學業如常,生活如常,一切沉悶、無聊、反智如常;因為你怕受傷害,你不會想知道什麼是最好的食物都沒有味道, 甚至連餓飽都忘了的感覺。但沒有極悲,又如何有極樂呢?人要經歷極悲、極樂才可以算是完整的人,才可以成長,有我在你身旁,集我們兩位天才之力有什麼事是撐不來?如果你怕極悲、極樂,則你一生最好都不要談戀愛,你的冒險精神又去哪兒呢?你是對自己沒有信心,還是對我沒有信心?
我的真心話,愛上你而又得你的心令我很痛苦,但比起沒有愛情,不知方向的空虛,還是可以接受。還是老一句,你愛我一分,我愛你十分,你對我忠心,我比你更忠心,你背叛我,我必以千部來報複。我不怕發動一場世界大戰來得到你,就算是核子彈把我炸到灰飛煙消,我的心沒有一刻會離開你。世上只有你最配我,亦只有我最配你。
還再想什麼: 有花須折直須折,莫待無花無折技!

在你中迷失,再在你中找回自己的人

非常重要的說話—握你手的感覺

我最想成為我妻子的XX,

前天除了想送花給你,算是一種了斷,如果你當時當面拒絕我,我會傷心但會如釋重擔,10個月的擔子真的很痛。我想告訴您,是什麼原因可以撐我達十個月之久,想喜歡心理學的你一定有興趣知。
不是最老土的你有什麼不平凡的長相、過人的聰明、相當豐厚的心理學知識,又或者身材令人想入非非。一切單獨條件和組合對一般人都可以是十足的理由,就算他們對另一位異位有同樣的感覺,都會當前一位的感覺是唯一的。這是我提及的愛情決擇理論,意識事後為事前的決定找過漂亮的理由。我的用意是說,這只是凡夫俗子的愛情,沒有什麼深奧的唯一性及大智慧在內。你給我的是一剎那觸電的感覺,一種我在與異性握手以致拖手時都未曾有過的感覺,對我來說是非常非常的震撼, 說出來真羞家,我的潛意識一直壓抑了「我被這種感覺所迷」的全部記憶,我真的以為是紫微斗數的論據、星座、時辰八字、數字學、姓名學以致心理分析可以證明我們是天生一對。但我一直忘記了,這些只可以在事後證明是否合拍,將來的發展會如何,但沒有一個以至全部可以提供一個先驗的理由,提供不可以用邏緝分析推出來或排斥的唯一性。有一段時間,我也以為你只是我衆多的心理遊戲對象之一,我以為自己和一般凡夫俗子一樣,都是利用這些客觀的數字來堆磡和你上床的理由。沒讀心理學的人不會明白我在說什麼,一來是遺忘了這段經歷,二來更高超的手段是使我不自覺地把這段經歷當成平凡的事。

如此平凡的事,如此震撼的感覺,只發生了兩次,上一次是在我打座時看到的「世界未日」預言期間。如果你有一點印象,你會留意到我在握你手前後的反應是相當呆滯,而口齒亦相當不流利。我當時亦很納悶,就算是即時對你有好感,因而產生怕羞的感覺,亦沒有可能有這樣的快,和如此的入心入肺。我當時只覺得好像是打開了某一扇的心門,有大量不同的影像和思想湧進來,一時間我的意識完全不懂如何處理,而我又有仿如身在夢中的感覺,有點像三魂唔見了七魄,最奇怪的是時間有一點被歪曲了的感覺,忽然有兩種時間並行,一種快一種慢,一方面看到外面的世界好像有點模糊及不清楚,另一方面又是正常的意識。如果你有留意一下我,你會發覺我似乎一直在發呆,因為我想捕捉這一閃即逝,非常模糊但奇怪的感覺,有點像transcendence 或 oneness with the universe,難聽一點是性愛最高峰的感覺(但在生理上不覺有任何的性興奮,亦不可能如此的快)。奇怪的事,就只是和你握完手剎那間,我又似乎完全遺忘了這種感覺,我記性不至於是如此的差,居然不到十秒鐘便忘記之前的感覺?

這種感覺,不單是和其他異性握手時沒有,就是拍拖時手拖手亦沒有,我的潛意識因此認定你一定就是具唯一性的這個人,而意識後來做的事,其實是為潛意識的動機找籍口。我亦因此認定,你在收了我一個月共二百多封電郵後再拒絕我是你有心隱瞞事實,是你有心逃避自己最心底、最原始、最真實的感覺。不可能我感受到震撼,而你竟然一點反應都沒有,你欺騙自己同時在嚴重傷害我,我不知你又和自己在玩什麼心理遊戲,最後受傷的一定是你自己。如果不是這種感覺,世上再沒有人可以令我寫二百多封電郵共三萬多字,用了二百小時以上,然後被你拒絕後不知再寫了幾多封,我想寫給你的中文字(別忘記我打中文是很慢的)是我的一生人的90%,竭而不捨地寫了八個月?如此的投入全因這種「失億」感覺令我100%認定,我們的緣份是天註定,再不會有任何的人可以如此的震撼我的靈魂。

我從來未曾和任何異性說過雷同的話,一字一句,直接出自真心。我以為你有和我同質的靈魂,只是你太沉迷於愛情的迷失感覺中,分不清什麼是由性興奮帶來的快感、什麼是用文字/場景刻意經營的心理效果、什麼是由靈魂深處發出的震撼。我的靈魂,曾經受創傷,但仍健在,它以愛和希望來生存。我見過沒有靈魂的人,但我當我看到你的相片,你只是迷失,你的靈魂尚在掙扎求存,請讓我來和你一生一世共同分享,這種和宇宙合一的奇妙感覺!

我是如此的有信心,因為我的直覺肯定當我們雙手一握,你將無法抗拒這種來自靈魂深處的震撼,我們的結合將代表舊世界的全面崩潰,世界為我們預備了一個最美麗的將來;這一切,由握你手的一刻開始,由你的決定作結。我可以放膽賭一舖,我可以把身家、性命、財產、靈魂全放在一個單是握手就可以為我帶來天人合一感覺的人;你夠不夠膽?你是否對任何一位異性,都有如此大的信心?亦或你把戀愛平凡化了,位位都是相差無幾?位位都是你事後創造出來的感覺來欺騙自己?你的愛情觀裏,沒有前世註定,沒有來世,什麼都是腦神經為繁殖下一代而做出來的幻影?

我這一世不會再說同樣的話兩次!你可以留下來,公諸於世,以任何方式保存,是為千秋萬世的明證,決不變心。我的路走完了,而且決不走回頭路,只要你肯和我一同走的話。

當你無法去分辨真假時,用你的直覺,忘記你的理性和邏緝吧!

此致
因你而迷失,再因你而找回自我
永遠愛你,此志不渝的

轉載:中秋節文化宣言

一年一度秋風勁。在中國大陸第一個中秋節（9月14日）法定公休日來臨之際，我們放眼世界，回看歷史，追溯我們祖先追求自由的傳統，召回他們追求自由的勇氣。

中秋節的傳說中，最震撼人心的，莫過於傳說月餅曾傳遞人們追求自由、反抗暴政的信息。
歷史記載：公元13世紀到14世紀中葉，在蒙元汗國暴政的統治下，奴隸大雜院中人分四等，第一等是征服者階層蒙古人，第二等是色目人，第三等是漢人（指中原先征服的各族），第四等為南人（江南人），蒙元汗國實施種族歧視和剝奪自由政策，不僅每隔幾年就重申禁止漢人擁有兵器、養馬、煉鐵等禁令，也禁止漢人學習蒙古文。蒙古人毆殺漢人不必償命，賠一頭驢子的價錢即可。在這種暴政之下，人民奮起反抗暴政。

中國傳說：朱元璋聯合各路反抗力量準備起義。但蒙元官兵搜查十分嚴密，傳遞消息十分困難。軍師劉伯溫便想出一計策，命令屬下把藏有「8月15夜起義」的紙條藏入月餅裡面，再派人分頭傳送到各地起義軍中，通知他們在8月15日晚上起義響應。到了起義的那天，各路義軍一齊響應，人民抗暴勢不可擋。

這個追求自由平等，反抗強權，用月餅作為媒體傳遞信息的故事，寄托了中國人民美好的期望。

今天，當人們在購買、食用中國傳統美食——月餅時，有多少人能知道蒙元汗國種族歧視的野蠻史和中華祖先反抗暴政、追求自由的智慧？有多少人能思考：當文字獄瘋狂的年代，別說月餅傳遞反抗的信息，吟一首詩歌、寫篇文章也會鋃鐺入獄、身死名裂、凌遲處斬、株連九族？有多少人能思考：在人類文明的先進成果互聯網上，每天蒸發、屏蔽的帖子有多少？有多少防火牆和網管、五毛在偷偷摸摸地行動，阻斷思想和言論的自由傳播，把我們民族弱智、恐嚇、退化為野蠻人？！

為此，我們在中秋節前夕發出三點呼籲

1.我們一方面要把中秋節過成中國人尊重傳統、尊重家庭親情的節日，一方面也要把中秋節過成中國言論自由節。我們要衝破一切心靈內外的枷鎖，自由地表達我們對世界的看法。一切箝制言論自由的屠夫與掠奪者，必將遭到我們的唾棄。

2. 我們認為，體育上的金牌固然是中國人競技體育進步的標誌，但言論自由的金牌，民選票選的金牌，才是每個中華民族的兒女應該努力追求、無比渴望的。傳說我們的祖先曾經用月餅來偷渡他們追求自由的信息，他們的月餅是他們勇氣和自由當之無愧的金牌。當我們回憶祖先追求自由的光榮傳統，在未來若干年，如果言論自由節的設想能付諸實現，言論自由金牌的模樣一定要參照月餅設計。

3.鑒於幾年前韓國端午祭成功申請為世界非物質文化遺產，中國朝野不僅有了對傳統節日申遺的緊迫感，也在張羅把中秋節申報為世界非物質文化遺產，我們特別提醒中國朝野諸公：中國中秋節的文化傳統的精髓就在於這個作為自由媒介的月餅。塞了起義字條的月餅，就是中國式的「萊剋星頓的槍聲」！

對於我們來說，言論自由甚至比衣食更加重要，言論自由是區分一個人是奴隸還是自由人的顯著標誌。

「幸福是自由的果實，自由是勇氣的果實。」我們在年年中秋節的夜晚，想起我們祖先追求自由、反抗暴政的勇氣與智慧，我們確信我們的呼籲儘管是爭議性話題，但終將被人們討論。
發起人、執筆人：凌滄洲（北京學者，資深媒體人）

聯署人：
凌滄洲（北京學者，資深媒體人）
田路（北京期刊主編）
滕彪（北京學者）
昝愛宗（浙江作家）
冉雲飛（四川學者）
趙國君（北京學者）
許志永（北京學者）
張星水（北京學者）
杜兆勇（北京學者）
李愚（北京期刊編輯）
張亦剛（廣州期刊編輯）
黃梓峰（北京報紙編輯）
莊道鶴（浙江學者）
溫克堅（浙江學者）

Is evolutionary theory a better ‘explanation’?

There is a growing debate between the Creationism and Evolutionary Theory in USA as raised by Christian Right, and, of course it argue that the former is a better explanation than later, while scientist argue otherwise. Although this is the topic of my thesis paper when I was studying in a Christian College, I am not going to dwell into this issue here. There are good discussion of it on the Internet. My point here is to play Devil’s Advocate on the common sense that evolutionary theory in Biology is a better explanation.

What people often missed in the debate is what is qualified as an explanation? I would like argue for the point that although Creationism is not consider as an explanation since it replace one unknown with another, there are some issues associated with calling evolutionary theory an ‘explanation’.

Evolutionary Theory belong to realm of science, what essentially it gave is the how of the process of evolution but not the why. Some has considered that science is not suited to answer this set of questions. Although once we know the process, we can extend the theory to test its external validity(see if it can made accurate prediction), or even applied that to application in daily life (genetics); but can process be consider as ‘explanation’? Does knowing how we breath ‘explain’ what is breathing? Does knowing how our mind works means we can understand what our mind is? What I believe is that evolutionary theory is only the first layer of onion, the process of peeling the onion could go on indefinitely as we want it. Suppose we get the Physicist’s holy grail: ‘Theory of Everything’. Does it means not that we can further ask: Why is Theory of Everything is one way but not the another? Can we dig further into TOE and understand how is what it is? Therefore I could sympathy with religionists stop the investigation in the very first step, they may just know that they can’t finish peeling the onion, and they want to save time to do something else.

Evolutionary theory, in my opinion, by its nature is not really about explanation but predicting what is going to happen next, because what it said essentially is: Now is because of what is happened in the past led to this now but not the other now, follow logics from Mathematics and Statistics; plus some accidents.’ Thus Evolutionary theory, like history, suffer the same problem as it belong to ‘retrospective’ science. We can’t verify how history develop since we can’t test one hypothesis against another in the sense that the past is gone. How could we know what happen if ‘Martin Luther King is not murdered?’, or ‘Al Gore instead of George W. Bush is elected in 2004′? Similarly, although we can do experiment to test the hypothesis in the laboratory, but we can never be sure that the parameters in the laboratory is identical to the parameters of the part of evolutionary history we inquire. Therefore, the internal validity of experiments against hypothesis in evolutionary theory can never be completely ascertained (unless we have a time traveling machine to collect the sample from the past). And we also must not ignore that evolutionary process is full of accidents, since we don’t know exactly how those accidents happen, therefore the ‘explanation’ afforded by evolution theory can never be completed. It is not the fault of this theory itself, but because of the nature of object we inquire about. But it never rules out that there maybe better methods and framework (other than the scientific method) to understand the phenomenas of what evolution theory talked about.

Thus my conclusion is ‘Evolutionary theory’ is the better one at least because it could be argue against, and we can use this framework to build more powerful explanation; as compare to Creationism which can never be objectively falsify. Notice there is a philosophical bias toward intellectualism: Those which allow we to think and argue must be better than those doesn’t allow to think. Why must this be right?

What is the internal validity of Philosophy?

I remember one line of the philosophical inquiry into the perception process like this: By the logic that a perceiver must be separated from perceived, therefore there must exist ‘little man’ who observe what we observe in our brain. But then how does these ‘little man’ know what they observing? Then it require a little man inside another little man’s brain. We can easily see how this lead to an absurd conclusion. So the conclusion is either perception is logically impossible or there is something wrong with this picture, likely its hidden assumption.
I prefer the later since there are obvious logically error with the picture: Why must perceiver must be separated from perceived? Why can’t perceiver also perceiving itself? Where does this notion that perceiver must be separated from perceived, which sounds so natural to us, come from?

I am not interested to dwell into the actual psychological history of this idea. I only think it is very likely it is coming from the logical rule of our mind rather than fact of physical reality. It has everything to do with the habit of our mind to separate the perceiver and separated in our Cognitive process. Thus it is natural to infer from this logic that there must be some mechanism to observe what is observed, since it is assumed that the observer itself has no explanatory power. Observation is obviously different from the process of understanding, therefore we habitually separate them into two categories. It thus follows that there must be two set of brain cells devoted to two different neurological process, since in our mind it is ‘natural’ to place one category in one slot.(Against the Pigeonhole Principle in Discrete Mathematics.) When one set of brain cell is responsible for observation, then another set of brain cell must be responsible for analyze it. How logical is it to infer the process in Physical space from the bias inherent in our Cognitive Process in Psychological Space?

This, I see it as the example of the issue in Philosophical reasoning. If only we can obliterate all assumption then we can arrive at the best understanding of the world, otherwise we may think we are analyzing the world objectively while we are subtly biased in one way or another.

何秀蘭與林忌的爭論:價值和方法的分歧

何秀蘭: 環保不是在考慮完所有其他因素之後再考慮的因素,而是以綠色思維去全局性的解決港島的塞車問題,興建公路不是唯一的解決問題思路;
林忌: 環保只是在考慮完所有其他因素如經濟、民生之後再額外考慮的因素,可重可輕,視乎情況。港島的塞車問題只可以見招拆招,沒有全局的解決方法,興建公路繞道是唯一的解決問題的思路。
高下立見!

(例如以下是一個解決超速問題的新方法/思路,可供參考!)

The thought of the idea of Prophecy

I had the benefit of born in cultures which heavily influenced by Buddhist Philosophy, therefore my inquiry into the idea of Prophecy has an headstart compare to people in non-Buddhist culture. To have a coherent world and to be logical, Prophecy is a special information object that doesn’t disrupt the original chain of causality(which it assume there is only one world but not many exists parallel to each other.) So we can likewise identify information object which has such a special property,

The logics are actually very simple:
A. There is only one future,
B. Prophecy allow an information travel backward from future to now,
If Prophecy can change future, then it follow that the Prophecy itself is either invalid, or at worst, it destroy the chain of causality which lead to the existence of Prophecy itself. Since neither is allowed to exists logically, then it follows that Prophecy is a self-servicing information object which seeds its only existence, or at least it always produce an effect that will not destroy the chain of causality lead to formation of itself. In other words, Prophecy is something never change the future.

轉載:捍衛社會公義,拒絕票站調查!

(轉載自: http://atheistdemo.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/%e6%8d%8d%e8%a1%9b%e7%a4%be%e6%9c%83%e5%85%ac%e7%be%a9%e6%8b%92%e7%b5%95%e7%a5%a8%e7%ab%99%e8%aa%bf%e6%9f%a5/)

請各位支持公正公平的選舉,不要向票站調查員提供任何真實的投票意向,無論你是否支持泛民主派,但你一定要支持真正反映民意的選舉,令中共的魔掌原形畢露,即只可以在投票站內做手腳!

Freud’s naive assertion: The impossibility of neurological correlate of Freudian psychological model

I remember when I was first expose to then fantasized by Freud conceptual model of human mind, the obsession is no less than jumping in love with someone. But as the passion recede I begin to see theoretical issues in his framework, what really repel me is his tendency to mechanization of human mind by suggest that maybe we should look for neurological correlate of Id, Ego and Superego. How on earth is he thinking?
For me, psychological world is an abstract representation of the biological functioning of brain in coordination with other organ. I admire his heroic effort to put the human body and biology back to where it suppose be, but psychology is different from biology. They must be distinct disciple of empirical research
. As anyone could imagine: the operation of something must be somewhat different from the structure of something, granted the assumption that psychology is nothing but operation of brain. What Freud is studying is how the psychology in operation, it would difficult in logic to reverse engine what biological structure lies behind the operation of psychology. There are really many ways to abstracting the mind, Freudian framework is just one out of many. How on Earth must he think that is the only valid way(so the correspondence with neurological structure implies)?
What happen if we push this idea to its limit: Id, Ego and Superego are three functionally distinct neurological structures. That means there are some brain damages/disease/condition which would weaken one but not another; that would be an interesting observation if it corresponding to observation by medical doctors Since Id, Ego and Superego are built in process of socialization, it follows that socialization process would alter the structure and functioning of human brain; so do psychoanalysis. Beside, since our psychological process is almost a reflection of biological process of the brain, that would be really amazing that human civilization could advance as much as we seen today!
The core difference between me and Freud is: I see thinking/emotion more as a process that represent advance usage of neurological structure, which is why human could be seen as a step forward in evolution that layers of flexibility is what give human freedom its essence. In Freud’s mind, human is mechanical and deterministic, which is yet to be demonstrate.

世俗主義在香港的兩個面向

在香港,近9成的人都可以籠統被歸類為世俗主義者,如何分類:很簡單,你問他/她的宗教信仰,他/她會回答你說:沒有特定的信仰。這和在西方常見的有神論 /無神論分野不同,在世俗主義文化生活已久的香港人,習慣了不對「宗教內」的事情表達意見;雖然有信仰的人卻不會怎分什麼是宗教內和宗教外的問題,宗教是一種生活方式,最多可以做的是不強迫他人相信你的宗教,但不可能事事以宗教/世俗來分野。
而令宗教在香港產生巨大的吸引力的,是香港奉行世俗主義者中另一些我不太認同的假設,它和平庸主義、功利主義和犬儒主義似乎是掛了勾。某些世俗主義者不以為世上有不犯錯的聖人,沒有在道德上是完美的,因此每個人便不用追求道德上的無暇,既然道德上無聖人,行為/思想亦不用完美,進而嘲笑這些在生活上/思想上追求完美的人,成為犬儒主義者,亦因此人人都是差不多的。因為他們以為世上沒有神聖的東西,或是終極的價值,因此所有人只應追求所有人都看得到,及所有人都以為是值得追求的,既然無聖人,自然亦不會有智者,因此我的想法不可能比其他人更真,我不可能比其他人聰明,變成平庸主義者。以此來論,理想主義本身是荒謬的,因為世上根本沒有理想的事業、沒有理想的愛情、更不會有理想的世界,把一生都放在不存在的東西上面,會不會是和宗教者追逐天堂一樣無聊和無意義呢?因此世俗主義者只追求看得的,凡是理想都是太遙遠了,因此香港成了一個失去理想的憧憬、對未來的熱情的社會,因為再多十年、廿年、百年,世界不會有本質的分別!
(這當然和香港政治現況有關,另文再談。)

殘症人士奧運會:中共真的傷健同樂,社會共融?

我在「環保的北京奧運」中,曾經針貶了中共國的所謂綠色奧運根本是一派胡言,想不到自詡為知識份子良心、公信第一的明報,懂得嘲笑美國傳媒為了入侵伊拉克自圓其說,而把鏡頭只局限於撒達娒廣場的一小撮的異見份子,而不去問一般伊拉克人的感受;在北京奧運一事,明知環保的慨念一定需由整體/全局的角度出發,但是明報社論只把鏡頭對準中共用作向外示範的北京市,而完全忽略了所謂綠色奧運對全中共國各省各市,及低下階層生活的影響。連最明顯的一百多萬義工用什麼交通工具進北京,過程中製造了幾多噸的溫室氣體、空氣污染?還沒有算一百多萬義工在北京會不會每天產生幾多公噸垃圾?而中共定是在數千萬人中挑選出這些義工,過程又有幾環保、幾公平,製造了幾多噸的溫室氣體、空氣污染?而這一百多萬義工回家時, 製造了幾多噸的溫室氣體、空氣污染?中共獎勵他們時,又製造了幾多噸的溫室氣體、空氣污染?傳送奧運火炬時,勞師動衆,唯恐世上無人不知,無人不曉,在過程又製造了幾多不必要的溫室氣體、空氣污染?明報的知識份子良心,去了哪裏?

套用中共為自己開創的「局部勝全局」思維,中共說奧運是綠色,(在北京城以內)自然就是綠色奧運,因此,如今中共再辨殘症人士奧運會,顧名思義,自然代表中共國在(在北京城中舉辦殘症人士奧運會時),中共國(在北京城中)真的傷健同樂的和諧社會了。明報在報導時,當然可以忽略括號中的時間(舉辦殘症人士奧運會)、地點(北京城)、人物(參與殘症人士奧運會的中外健兒),讓香港人以為中共對待傷健人士一向都是一流的;而以在北京奧運拍中共馬屁聞名的無線,自然是「血脈沸騰、身為中國人很嬌傲、中(共)國真的是傷健同樂的和諧社會」,兩者只差未把余秋雨大師的「在中共國,仲做傷健人仕,也幸福」宣之於口而已。

話說回來,在以最低標準來看,環保最低程度亦真是中共的國策,最勉強可以說成中共的專制官僚不懂如何去真正的環保,想而有心無力;但是利用殘症人士奧運會把中共說成中(共)國真的傷健同樂,社會共融;這個謊也未免撤得太離譜了嗎?正常人用常識去想一想,是不是全中國的城市都是達到無障城市的標準,我已經不談中共國全國了,及不及得上香港;另外,你看深圳滿街都是愛滋病人,傷健人仕的基本生活保障又如何呢?中共國有沒有像香港一樣的平等機會組織保護傷健人仕的各種權益,還是隨隨便便一份工作都可以在招聘廣告上聲明只要俊男美女?另外,如果中共真的是尊重傷健人仕的話,北京奧運時在北京為什麼一個傷健人仕都不見,反是個個都貌美如花,身體健全呢?而中共的各級政府/黨組織中,有沒有一定比例的傷健人仕作成員呢?而中共的各級政府/黨組織中,有沒有代表傷健人仕的組織、委員會呢?

依此邏緝,香港的馬屁精無線電視,反智的明報大慨會以為觀衆真的會相信,中共只要再辦國際文化比賽,則中共國是世界文化之首;中共只要再辦國際棋藝比賽,則中共的民智是世界前列;中共只要再辦世界華人發明比賽,則中共國是世界上最有創意的國家;中共只要再辦窮人奧運,則中共國是窮人天堂;中共只要再辦同性戀奧運,則中共國是不同性向者的天堂。大凡是社會問題,中共只要搞個「運動」會就可以消失,則中共國頓成人間樂士!

如果明天是普選,你會不會投票?

我指的是不支持香港現在實行普選的人!

Why Euler's Coil must have 4 coils as minimum?

That is for two ‘waves’ from the source electromagnetic coil to be merge in each electromagnetic coils, which may produce an effect similar to that of Parallel Path Effect.

The silly original of Antisemitism

I can’t really believe my ears when my Psychology Professor talk about the root cause of Antisemitism in USA. One hint is those who are antisemitic are often deeply devout to Protestantism or Catholicism. Judaism, by definition, denies the validity of the foundation of Christianity, which Jesus is merely seen as a prophet but not messiah or God incarnated. Moreover, Jesus Christ is tortured and killed by Jews which see him as man pretending to be God. Then added to the trouble is Israel is the most restricted country for Christian missionary, maybe more so than Muslim countries. Plus the monopoly of several industry sector in USA by Jews.

We can perhaps see how naive and silly is American mindset. They appears to apply the following logic:
Kill/Torture Jesus Christ=Bad,
Jews do the Kill/Torture,
Jews is bad people.

They seems to forgot that without the hideous treatment and suffering of this Jew. How could Christianity be formed otherwise? How would Christian from all of the world to identify him as the saint without suffer the greatest hardship?

The nature of Prophecy

My idea of prophecy is somewhat differ from the common definition. IN my opinion, prophecy is not itself passively predict what is happening in future, rather it is structure in such a way, when revealed, that would concatenate the existing tendencies toward a future as predicted. Prophecy could thus consider an active shaper of history rather than just waiting to be compared with result. Therefore those prophecies that are never revealed is pointless, and is doubtful of their accuracy.
So prophecy, in a sense, is how the future affect the present in such a way to instantiate itself. And it should consider to be more than merely information, because it also contain an psychological effect on the reader, thus it could seen as a self-recursive loop much like the universe.
I don't believe in the assumption that any n instance of possible outcome must share equal probability. Nature is seldom that fair, and it often biased toward certain direction of development in subtle ways. Those, we could theoretically separate the real prophecy from other ‘false’ prophecy by comparing the process which they come to realize themselves through existing social-political structure through possible reader. We could examine through the route of how prophecy realize itself.

For a superficial instance, there are prophecy talking about Communist China become the most powerful country in the world, and there are those who talk the exactly opposite way. We could thus examine the validity through its effect on the reader. Assume what Communist China lack at the time of surfacing of this prophecy is just morale and self-confidence, then this prophecy has higher chance to be realize than sooth-saying ones via itself psychological effect. On the other hand, if what Communist China now is suffering from delusion of grandeur, overconfidence and arrogance at the moment it appears, then this prophecy meme has lower chance of materialize itself since it harm its own cause . From this understanding, I consider the prophecy of ‘Doomsday for Communist China’ has more chance to be realized.

My commentary on an Overunity Generator design

While I was studying those designs here, I discover there are fatal technicalities that the inventor may have overlooked. Namely, that we can NOT directly connect electromagnetic coil from the magnet of lower layer, otherwise there will be situations which the Back EMF from one layer cancel the EMF produced by retardation effect of coil wired on magnet, therefore create an unnecessary constraint on the timing of rotation of layer. My suggestion is to use capacitor and electrical circuit as a buffer to store the electrical energy produce by retardation of magnet of lower layer, and then it would only magnetize the upper layer’s electromagnetic oil at suitable time.

北京奧運是世界未日的序幕

1. 如果可阻止北京奧運發生,四未日天使之一「戰爭」不會被釋放出來;雖然油管之爭亦是一定發生,西方和俄羅斯因語言、文化的心結仍在,但沒有奧運的停戰令作掩飾,喬治亞不會夠膽向北奧塞亞出兵。同時,如果不是由以假代真聞名天下,不受西方尊重的中共來舉行,喬治亞在心理上不太可能違反奧運的停戰令。

2. 因為北京奧運,中共國忽略了全國的環境保護,結果依據大紀元消息,舉辦奧運城市爆發傳染病的消息被掩蓋。可幸的是好像不是太多外國遊客(?)去看奧運,但瘟疫可能因此散播到全世界,中共國的環境保護問題,變成全球問題。環境保護問題為副,政治問題才是元凶,世界明知中共的內外問題,但為了錢照來不誤,是自作孽。

3. 因為北京奧運,曾蔭權無暇理香港大事,結果副部長+梁展文+(?)連中三元。他為了獻媚可能斷送自己的政治前途。

4. 因為北京奧運,中共勞民傷財,傷及元氣,回天乏術,又因不理天時地利,結果賠了大本(中共內部文件指全國總成本為12000億:100萬義工留在北京損失的生產值、人民戰爭式保安的花費、工廠停工、北京不少商業活動被停止、武警公安駐防的工錢、各項環保措施造成的經濟損失及六個奧運城市人口外流的經濟損失,不包括東海油田及美國房按)。中共國今年天災連連,大型民變數起(楊佳案),經濟又是有史以來最差的一年,天氣署熱,而所謂北京奧運的經濟成果只會加劇社會的積怨,為了北京奧運又要開放網外境站,遲一點又有被煽動的黑客作反,中共要捱過今年是要超級好運的事來沖喜,歡笑今宵散場以後怎麼辦?很奇怪,我曾算出來的中共滅亡日期居然有2個,錯的一個簡直好像是亂來的,唔通錯有錯着?

5. 北京奧運聖火傳送全世界的象徵意義,雖名叫祥雲火炬.但是一來所到之處無一是晴天,二來火炬背後的中共國今年天災人禍連連,可謂相當不祥,三來火炬本身無故熄滅之次數破了世界紀錄,並非吉兆,四來上屆火炬交接儀式前,半個希臘都陷於火海,亦非祥端,五來中共最喜用紅色,火炬本身是火氣旺盛,而所到之處均是愛國憤青以紅色旗海迎接,甚至連香港亦不例外,鮮紅色難免令人聯想到血流成河,而火代表戰爭、暴動和不安。合起來的意思就是因為西方世界失去道德,結果世界被北京奧運引發的火焰包圍,四處都是戰爭、暴動和不安。從心理學的角度去看,北京奧運聖火在整個國際政治、經濟、社會情況下,在人類集體潛意識中引發出不安、燥動和攻擊性,加上世界本身陷於的能源危機、溫室效應、通脹、恐佈主義威脅的處境,加快了人類文明的毀滅過程。

My extention of this Prophecy

My father’s thought on this prophecy:

1. Obama win the US election;
2. White supremacist group assassinate Obama;
3. The assassin is caught but release, Africa American charge US government for conspiracy;
4. Some Black dominated States seeking independence from USA, Federal Court denies, those States taking up arms.
5. Civil War in USA!

打賭的結果

無人敢,支持中共者如是,反對中共者如是!
如此的反應在心理學有什麼意義呢?

Prophecy, Signs and Interpretation of a vision

In according to my vision 16 years ago during my meditation, the following is my interpretation of it.

1. Christianity in the existing form is fundamentally wrong, it contradict with the laws of supernatural.
2. There will be an end of world within my generation, to prepare the way for New Age.
3. WWIII will happen before the change, absolutely terrible.
4. Before New Age comes, there will be War, Famine, Chaos, Disease.
5. Energy is infinite in its amount, and it is everywhere.
6. I am an agent and massager for this change, yet I am not messiah, I can only help those who want to help themselves to accept this change.
7. After this change, I will lost this pre-cognitive ability.
8. The change will arrive in an unanticipated way and in a form unable to predict by existing common-sense or science.

I see Beijing Olympic is the sign which this prophecy is fulfilled. By cooperating with the evil Chinese Communist Party the Western world has blood on their hands. The Olympic torch is in the color red, symbolize blood and war. Since it traveled around the global, that symbolize bloodshed and war will spread around the global which Beijing Olympic is the root cause. There will not be an Olympic Games in the future due to this causation.

How 4 is fulfilled:
War between Russia and Georgia has brought out the first day in Beijing Olympic. Oil and energy crisis is the underlying cause, but the hostility base on difference of culture and language between Western Europe and Russia is also the cause, and also because Communist China is notorious for its disrespect for honesty and truth, therefore Georgia will not honor the Olympic Pact.
Communist China is what brought this Age into the final chapter, and one sign of New Age would be the dismantle of Chinese Communist Party. It is the root cause of evil in this Age!