何以腎為人的元氣之本?

我以為中醫如此說有兩層意思,腎在男女間都是和生物所以是生物的原因:可以繁殖下一代,而男女的性能力都和腎經的運作有莫大的關係,所以腎代表人的元氣; 另外是我受「Life, Energy, Information and Tao」一文啟發,生物所以為生物因為它是有組織性的複雜,如此的組織能力似乎是違反熱力學第二定律中宇宙只會日漸趨向無序和混亂,生物巧妙的利用外界源源不絕的能量來減低自己的熵值,於生物而言,死亡及受傷都是被迫回複無序和混亂.要竭力避免。因為腎的功用在於保持血液的清潔,減低血液的其他混和液體,即直接減低血液的熵值,而血液為生命之基本腎為人的元氣之本。

好古怪及無聊的小主意(１)

(又是另一個本來可以伸請專利的主意來獻世,自己得不到任何益處,唯一最欣慰這點是看到有人善用我的主意,彷如看到自己的孩子快高長大,造福社會。)

小時侯的體育鞋的底常常穿,再入石仔,走路時不舒服。
不過現在想來其實是有益身心健康,特別對長者及行動不便者有複康及行氣活血之效,做法就是在穿鞋時在內隴放入石仔(或小型的波子),如此只要你不怕痛,你就可以邊行街邊做腳底按摩,不知不覺間改善自己的血液循環,而不用專程搭車上深圳去做腳按摩。不過要小心選擇石頭,怕痛的人可選表面平滑一點的石頭,如想效果更好及更快,則不妨選一些表面尖一點的,可謂苦口良藥;另外,要注意不要連續多用過一星期,最好是兩三天後停用一天,以免腳下的皮膚硬化。

The Basic idea of Static Wheel

In ideal condition, since the static charge is insulated, therefore it seldom require the Power Supply circuit to replenish it. But the wheel will keep rotating, and the output of this wheel can lead to the rotation of a Generator, thus electricity is produced.

staticwheeldesign0718

One would also question whether this example is violating the law of conservation of energy, since the theoretical output could be greater than input.

The Process:
1. Charge is pumped to the charge holder using power source.
2. Charge holder held the electrostatic charge.
3. The metal plate in the middle would respond by producing charge opposite to charge in the charge holder. The location of the charge holder is such that the total electrostatic attraction forces would resulted in net force in one direction. (It may take experiments to determine where we could produce the greatest resultant force.)
4. Unbalance torques thus cause the metal plate to rotate.
5. The Rotor thus turn.

(We could also replace electrostatic charge with electromagnetic coil, but the disadvantage is that electromagnetic coil require constant supply of electrical energy, while former cost less in terms of electrical energy.

Biological idea: Replace the gene of human eye

One often cited argument from creationist is organ as complex as eye can’t be evolved by mere evolution, so eye must be designed from scratch. I would leave open the question how a designed eye compatible with other evolved organs. Unbeknown to most creationist is there are two ‘designs’ of eye, one which that the blood vessel is in front of the retina, another is which the blood vessel is behind the retina; it would leave to immense creativity of creationist to construe the argument why human being is endow with the later, thereby the inferior design? Why would the Almighty Christian God prefer jellyfish over human in the matter of eyesight?
My interest about eye design is not related to the enduring creationist-evolution debate, my interest is about the possibility of engineering a better eye for human being. Since we can transfer the gene from one species to another, why couldn’t we transfer the gene for manufacturing better designed eye from jellyfish to human gene pool? I don’t think anyone could find an argument against improve the eyesight of human as a species. What short term and long term disadvantage would a better eyesight confer to human being?
DNA-engineering offer human being an unique evolutionary advantage over other species: While other species have to use trial and error to find the gene most adapted to the existing environment which cost million animals their lives, human being can test-trial their idea of improvement pool in laboratory and inside computer. So what take other species a million years to develop, we as human only need to take a billion trial inside the computer(that is less than a hour in fast computer.)
So why not try this idea on human?

致曾蔭權的公開信

行政長官曾蔭權先生你好,

本人得聞曾蔭權先生最近因副部長制一事成了反對派及傳媒的攻擊對象,因為自香港政府成立十年來,貧富不均問題在香港的經濟結構下一直未有改善,而前 任董建華亦留了一幅難攤子給你,在此等經濟環境下,他們如果不借你來消消氣,就不當你是特首了。本來香港是自由經濟,香港政府再強亦不可以指揮經濟,不可 以把責任全推到你身上,可惜你一而再,再而三提出了具爭議性的政策,而九月立法會選舉臨近,如果不攻擊你就拿不到選票了。
我有一個相當大膽的建議,希望可以幫到你,因為你剛提出拿一百億去為四川賑災,本意及出發點都是非常好,只是提出的時機不對,如果你在五一二地震發生後第 二天立刻提出此想法,則大有可能被立法會即時通過,並在中國內外受一致讚賞,如今事過境遷,香港人正為通脹而煩惱,經濟又未見有起色,而且還是在副部長制 的陰雲未消下提出,要成功當然是有難度了。但是,我不以為立法會一定會否決此次撥款,問題是你要有辦法令議員不可以拿損給四川的一百億和其他的項目如增加 長者生活浦貼、減稅、增加綜援等相提並論,前者不是投資亦無法保證物盡其用,後者卻可以被視為投資在市民身上,不過現在百物騰貴,成效頗成疑問。
我以為政府可以嘗試從問題的根本着手,通脹的主要成因是油價居高不下,而香港的工商業十分倚重不可再生的化石燃料。所以政府必須試圖減低香港對化石燃料的 依賴,我以為目前的另類能源如風能、太陽能及節能措施都是杯水車薪,除非政府可以撥款一億資助新能源的開發。雖然看來是冒險一點,但以你和中共國政府今年 屢遭天災人禍的勢頭,你大有可能成為董建華第二,因此兵行險着是其時。

我所指的新能源,是指非主流科學研究者提出的新能源(Overunity),它們可以大大減低生產能量的成本,而中共國亦打算在2009年使用同屬Overunity類的匈牙利開發的EMB技術,而台灣的民進黨本來亦打算在2000年購入,這是世界大勢,亦可能是你任內最大的成就!如果你真的打算非捐不可,不妨考慮買豬肉搭豬骨的策略,趕在議員之前,自己提出一藍子的撥款建議,迫議員去承受過量撥款的政治後果。

我同時亦寄了信給中國總理溫家寶及台灣馬英九總統,請你慎重考慮!

此致
一班關心世界能源危機的香港發明家

Biological invention: Artificial Muscle

This is an idea I got when I study this invention.

Everyone has the experience of twisting a wet tower to expel all the water it has soaked. It is difficult to achieve this goal if you had a mighty hand. Then I was thinking: Since tower itself wasn’t make to be a tough material, it is only this way of moving this tower creating the toughness in the tower.
So if I am going to design the muscle from the scratch, I would build muscle fiber using long chain of muscle cells surrounded a long axial cells. In the normal state, they are twisted clockwisely or anti-clockwisely to a smaller extent so the distance between two ends is shorter than its length if it is fully unscrewed. There is a central axial acting to fix the level of twisting of the outer muscle. Upon receive the message from the nervous system, the central axial would turn either more clockwisely or anti-clockwisely, thus the outer muscle would increase its extend of twisting. As the outer muscle is sticked into location. Therefore, it would become shorter as a result. Force is thus exerted by the outer muscle to do useful work.

Further Development of Euler's Coil

(Original at: http://eulertruthbible.wordpress.com/2008/06/28/eulers-coils-foundation-mcssf-and-its-extension/)

Euler's Coil Technology is essentially the ways which electromagnetic coil arranged could affect its mutual inductance of the system as all. We can manipulate that to cause an imbalance of inductance in the magnetization of those electromagnetic coils, and the Back EMF caused by inductance in the demagnetization of those electromagnetic coils, so to harvest extra electrical/magnetic energy from the system. What I originally thought of is not using electromagnetic coil but the question: We all know that a magnetic field is weaken by distances, what if we feedback the magnet field from a field-emitting object back to itself? Does that achieve an strengthening effect on original field-emitting object itself?
Only now does I know that it is already been discovered in electromagnetism as the ‘Close-Loop’ Effect’, the magnetic field is stronger when placed near an object that would produce an induction effect. In a sense, the presence of field-responding object has create self-reinforcing circle of reinforcement of these magnetic fields.

Now what if we added the effect of Parallel Path Technology into that? i.e. If we have more than one close-loop that feedback to its original magnetic field-emitting object, wouldn't be able to strengthening the magnetic field further? Moreover, if Euler's Coil is arranged in such a way that some receiving coils are under the influence of more than one electromagnetic coils (i.e. For instance, in this arrangement). It is possible that the source electromagnetic coil would interacting with more than one electromagnetic coil, so it get more than one source of feedback. Suppose we arranged all of them that would mutually reinforce the effect of varying the polarity of one end of electromagnetic coil, would that theoretically further increase the effect of Euler's Coil, thus we could increase the extra electrical energy harvest from this invention?

How does this Overunity device works?

We are using this Overunity Device already approved by Japanese Patenting Authority as an example to illustrate a few simple points:

The purpose of each component are as such:
A. The pair of Permanent Magnet, controlled by an independent rotor, rotating on its own accord to produce a change of magnetic field experienced by the generating coil in the middle.
B. The rotor of Permanent magnets, is to produce change of magnetic field experienced by the generating coil in the middle in combination with 1.
C. The generating coils are responsible for translating the change of magnetic field experienced by itself to electrical voltage and current via Lenz’s Law. It is also responsible for producing magnetic current that has magnetic polarity which is opposite to the other generating coil(s) in the other sides, for the sake of nullifying the effect of the other magnetic current from other generating coil.
D. The ferromagnetic material responsible for creating a tunnel which magnetic current from other generating coils to merge and nullify each other’s effect.
(I ignore the description of other less important components here.)

Process:
1. Rotor of Permanent Magnet rotate, together with the presence of Permanent Magnet to produce an effect of change of Magnetic field experienced by the generating coils. The rotation of components A is such that a pair of them are always in opposite polarity.

2. The generating coils in the middle experienced the change of magnetic field created by Process 1, and it response to it according to Lenz’s Law, thus electrical current and magnetic current is produced. However,
since there are pairs of generating coil, and each of them always generate a magnetic current that is of opposite polarity of each other.

3. The magnetic currents produced by generating coils are merge together in component D. Since they are of opposite magnetic polarity and of the same strength, therefore the effect is a complete cancellation of the effect of magnetic currents as a whole in the invention. There are no net magnetization of the component D.

4. Since there are no net magnetic currents flowing in the component D, thus Inductance of each generating coil is only equal to the inductance of the coils itself without the iron core. We could effectively ignore the presence of component D in this process. Therefore each component C would produce a much weaker magnetic field resisting the approach of component A of the electrical current it produce.

5. Nevertheless, component A would experience a small resisting force due to Lenz’s effect of component C, causing it to slow down. However, the effect of that is minimal consider the amount of electrical current component C produce.

Technicalities:
1. The permeability of component D must be carefully chosen to match the desired amount of electrical current produced. If it is lower than what expected of the electrical current produced by component C, the efficiency of the invention as a whole would be lowered.
2. The distance between the pair of component C should be minimize to reduce the lost of magnetic currents(thus reduce the effect of cancellation intended by this invention.) We could use Magnetic field detector to check the magnetic field leakage around the invention to achieve this object. Nevertheless, we expect the cancellation effect of magnetic current is always less than 100%.
(I ignore other trivialities of electrical generator design here.)

From the perspective of energy:
1. Kinetic energy of Component A cause Electrical energy to be formed at component C.
2. The Magnetic energy of component C are canceled in component D and C.
3. Thus the effect of Lenz’s Law of component C is largely minimized, the Kinetic energy of component B is reduced by an amount much lesser than what is expected of the amount of electrical current in traditional
electrical generation process.
i.e. Kinetic energy dissipated in A« Electrical energy generated in C.
Excessive energy is resulted in running the component A with lesser amount of electrical energy. To further improve its effect, we could let the component A run for a while with component C switch off. The load of component C is carefully monitor so it is not producing a retarding force large enough to disturb the rotation of component A.

Compare to traditional electrical generation process:
1. Kinetic energy of Component A caused Electrical energy of component C.
2. The Electrical energy of component C come along with magnetic energy of component D.
3. Magnetic energy of component D has the effect of retarding the motion of component B, i.e. the Kinetic energy of component B is largely dissipated.

i.e. Kinetic energy dissipated in A≥ Electrical energy generated in C.