如何去拆散一粒電子?

這篇文章提到的科學原理其實和上一篇相差不遠，既然可以用快速的電磁場變化來把原子最外層的電子拆走，要是我們用此方法在一粒電子上，則同理電子會感應電磁場而自轉，當電磁場快速的由一極變化到相反的一極時，我們就可以不用超長的圓形軌道就可以做電子內部結構的研究，當然先決條件是可以把電子由原子中拆出來，然後再以此方法處理。當然亦要用到我的發明。

如何拆散一個原子?

這是朋友發明的自己清潔換水器帶給我的靈感，他以為最清潔的洗衣服方法不是單一方向不停轉而寄望於水流和衣服的磨擦，反而應是一個方向旋轉一會，形成轉動慣性後再向另一方向旋動，如此一來就有兩部的轉心力把污蹟沖走(但不可以用現行的馬達，因為如此會大大縮短它的壽命，要重新設計)。我之前也用英文發表過類似的想法應用在把原子電離化上面，因為電子是以一定的軌跡繞着核心轉動，而和電子轉動的方向的平均累加形成了原子的磁場，因此如果用強大的電磁場先引導所有電子向一個方向旋轉，然後忽然用另一個相反的電磁場先引導所有電子向相反方向旋轉，於是原子的最外層電子便有可能因為離心力比電子和質子的吸引力還要強而被扯離原子，於是我們便可以很方便的把原子離子化。但關鍵是目前任何的電磁線圈都有一定的電磁慣性，不可即時不單退磁，更可以轉到另一方向，所以就要應用我的新發明了。

食鬼遊戲的主意一個

原文在這裏，這篇只是翻譯它的意思;
通常食鬼遊戲都是用家一直被幾隻鬼追箸，用家要一路逃跑，一路盡快吃盡分佈於迷宮每一處的豆豆，而其中有四粒是分佈在四角落的，它們的特殊用途是改變用家和鬼的角色，在有限時間內改寫遊戲規則，以前用家必須逃避鬼，規則是當他們相遇代表用家玩完，而現在則是相反﹐鬼必須逃避用家，要是鬼踫到了用家則鬼必須重新由迷宮中央再開始。
我的想法為了增加遊戲的刺激性，我們可以給用家自己改變遊戲進行的時序，加入健康程度來模擬現實，這些豆豆被分成二/三類，一類是增加用家的能量，當用家吃掉它們則可以愈走愈快，越過某臨界點時則改寫遊戲規則，現在鬼必須逃避用家，要是鬼踫到了用家則鬼必須重新由迷宮中央再開始;另一類是減低用家的能量，當用家吃掉它們則會愈走愈慢，越過某臨界點時，遊戲規則則會是用家必須逃避鬼才能生存。換句話說，即使是一模一樣的迷宮，但遊戲規則會因用家的策略和處境而變，一局當中其實是暗藏了許多局。而可以改變的健康指數則代表了人生在世是沒有絕對的優勢式劣勢，一切視乎局勢轉變及玩家如何運籌為握!
(更古怪的主意可以是玩家的健康不能太好或者太差，前者會自爆而死，後者會因衰弱而亡!)

解迷宮的一個數學方法

這篇文章翻譯自這裏，原作者是我，想可能早有數學家提出，只不過是了一了自己的心願而已。
要解迷宮就必須借助矩陣，而且一定是具備可解的條件，就是迷宮可清清楚楚地拆開成由外而內的一層層，每一層之間是獨立(換句話說，如何改動這一層也影響不了另一層的空間分佈)，而用可通達性矩陣(accessibility matrix)就可以完整地描述這一層的空間分佈，而每一層的空間分佈指的是它到底被牆璧分成了幾多個不可以不經另一層才抵達的區間，簡單點說，如果第一層被分成了三區間，玩家處身於其中一個區間中是不可能在同一層穿牆而到另一個區間，其他遊戲的物件也需循守同樣的規則，這些區間亦是獨立的，發生在一區間的事不可以影響的另一區間。另外，我們亦假設玩家必須由一層進入最近的一層，不可以有隊道由第一層跳到第三層。
可通達性矩陣(accessibility matrix)就是整個解迷宮方式的靈魂，它借用了圖論的慨念，把一層中各區間能否去到另一層的各區間用1和0去表達，例如第一層有3個區間而第二層有5個區間，則我們可以用一3*5的可通達性矩陣來表達雙方的互通程度;又或者用一幅三點到五點的可通達性圖來表達。我們可以如是者把由第一層到第二層，第二層到第三層....如此類推的可通達性圖或n幅可通達性矩陣來表達。如此我們便完整地述描整個迷宮的可通達性，要解迷﹐即利用可通達性圖找出一條在入口所在的層及區間到出口所在的層及區間的路徑，而通常迷宮都是把入口定在最外層的一個區間而出口定在最外層的另一個區間，另外亦可利用n幅可通達性矩陣作運算而求指定的解，用人算來可能會很麻煩，但用電腦去解則一點難度也沒有。

如何去解n次方的可分解不等式

我記得在中二時,數學老師叫我們依書本提供的方法去解2/3次方的不等式絕對是一件苦差,先嘗試把2/3次方的不等式因式分解成2/3個不等式的因子,然後再逐個個去試去解,一條數最快也要10分鐘才解完,做完數學功課,電視的兒童節目也做完了。於是我當時就想出了一個可大量節省時間的方法,看箸別人埋頭苦幹時自己可自由發夢,別有快感,不知現在愈來愈貴的教科書有沒有比以前進步,編者想到我想到的方法?(鄭重聲明,未經我同意教科書不可以拿來作謀利用途!)

這個方法其實用了邏緝作輔助,所以提高了效率。流程是這樣的,首先自然是把n次方的不等式化成n個因子,然後把所有不等式除以x的乘積,如三條不等式分別是:(2x-3)(3x-5)(4x-8)>0,則我們可分別列出(x-3/2)(x-5/3)(x-2)>0,再把所有因子用x的0次方的項數由小至大加以排列,即(x-3/2)(x-5/3)(x-2)>0,考慮到在任何自然數集下此關係一定為真(x-3/2)>(x-5 /3)>(x-2),現在再去思考一下,如果要三個因式的乘積為正,因為3是單數,所以一是3者同為正值,另外唯一可能性是首項為正,後兩項為負。在前一種情況,只要數值永遠為最少的一項即第三項為正值,其餘不可能變成負值,所以只要(x-2)>0或x>2則為此不等式的其中一解;在後一種情況,即首項為正值,後兩項為負值,首項為正即(x-3/2)>0或x>3/2及x-5/3<0或x<5/3(第三項可以不理),所以第二解為3/2換句話說,答案為3/22。

同理,要是我們要解(2x-3)(3x-5)(4x-8)<0,即(x-3/2)(x-5/3)(x-2)<0,我們已知在任何自然數集下此關係一定為真(x-3/2)>(x-5/3)>(x-2),再因為3是單數,要3個數的乘積為負數,只有兩個可能,一是三項因式同為負值,二是因式數值最細者為負,其餘因式為正。所以,要三項因式同為負值,只要首項為負值即可,所以即(x-3/2)<0或x<3/2;另外,要第三項為負及第二項為正,即(x-2)<0或x<2及(x-5/3)>0或x>5/3,所以解為2>x>5/3。
換句話說,答案為x<3/2及2>x>5/3。

用了此一方法去幫助,一條n次方的不等式,最多是考慮n+1次而不像傳統教科書要考慮2^n次,然後再用負數的單次次方一定為負數,負數的雙次次方一定為正數,正數的單雙數次次方一定為正數,尚可再減低要考慮的次數,例如要解一條7次方大於零的不等式,我們只要考慮分別是尾兩項、四項及六項為負的情況即可以。如此才算是教科書的增值,不是會叫會唱的容祖兒頭像在唱1+1=2!

發明主意:自動感應太陽方向的可移動上蓋

筆者常常乘巴士,發覺巴士公司為令乘客天舒適的路邊巴士站設計在夏天時有相當的缺點,只可以擋風擋雨卻不可以擋太陽光,因為太陽的方位隨地球自轉不停改變,所以只有當中午時才發揮到用不透明物料做的上蓋的隔光作用,其他時間會有乘客為了避免被太陽光直接照射而被迫走到巴士站以外。我以這是可以用簡單的方法去改善的。首先,必須把不透光物料做的上蓋改成可以左右移動的,由可轉動的軸來承扥在第二層上蓋上,然後再用6-8組分別放在第一層可移動上蓋的各邊陲,而每一組光籤接駁到獨立的感光電阻分別被固定在和地軸平行面上的各方向,用意是偵測太陽光在向方向的強度,把所以組別在同一方向收集到的數據收集起來,並用簡單的電子邏緝來判斷何者為最強,輸入控制可轉動的軸的摩打的線路(或只加強同一方向的電磁線圈來吸引鐵做的支架),令上蓋自動移到同一方向(或用單的電子邏緝來判斷,移動到可最大幅減低剛在未移動前的階段中最強訊號的方向為止)。更聰明的方法當然是善用太陽能,最上層上端是用太陽能電池來吸收太陽能,令系統自給自足;而陰天時因太陽能不足,系統也不夠電去運作,當時亦不需要此系統來運作!

發明主意:觸膜式鍵盤

因為母親常常投訴我晚上用鍵盤打字的聲浪過大,於是便買了整個用塑膠做的可清洗鍵盤回家,因為塑膠物料吸收了按鍵時的壓力,所以用的時侯近乎是無聲無息了,不過它卻有兩個致命傷:1.為了省成本而把鍵排得太密,常常誤中副車;2.它是用和一般鍵盤常用的電子線路去感應輸入,因為手指的壓力被塑膠卸去了, 常令我手臀酸軟。因此,怪不得如此方便的發明也不是太流行。
我想的一個解決以上技術問題的方法,就是把輸入由電子線路去接受按鍵發出的訊號改為用靜電感應,而靜電感應就是在商場電梯常見的按鈕方式,利用皮膚天然存在的靜電,當遇到金屬時會發生放電效應來偵測手指在按哪一個鍵,又或者用塑膠物料包箸可導電的物料,然後再用電子線路去偵測該兩瑰金屬片形成的電場的電壓改變。如此一來,鍵盤依然是可以整個清洗,及把它捲起收藏,但是用家卻不會因此而用到手臂酸軟,定可因此大增塑膠鍵盤的銷路!

Static elevator system?

Last time I introduce a problem of energy efficiency in all elevator, namely that the gravitational potential energy gained by having a balancing weight on the process of elevator going upward is lost on its way back. So I suggests two way to 'resolve' this technicality: First is by making the balancing weight adjustable; Second is to changing how the balancing weight is interacting with the elevator. Needn't me make explicit my design, some intelligent reader may already in the same train of thought as I: To pass the tension generated by the balancing weight, it is not necessary to put the elevator and balancing weight in the same cable.
One we made this conceptual breakthrough, then it follow the logic that we can separate the gravitational force and how that acting on the subject by using a tension transferring system to transfer the tension produce by gravity acting on balancing weight. That system could be as simple as pairing of electromagnet and iron wheel, or more complicate system like magnet and electromagnet using the generator effect. With this system we can now fine tune how the tension produced by the balancing weight affect the cable carrying the elevator, i.e. the timing, quantity and direction of the force.
Suppose we now have this system in place so we turn on and turn off the effect of tension produced by the balancing weight on the cable carrying the elevator. However, we are still one step from using the tension produced by the balancing weight disentangled with the nature gravitational energy because what goes up must goes down. My suggested design is couple the wheel driving the elevator with unidirectional gear and break down the upward/downward motion of it to thousandth. Now imagine when the elevator is going upward,given the balancing weight is ten to hundred times of the expected weight of elevator, then the weight of the elevator is transferred to the balancing weight resulting in minimal downward motion. Suppose we now locked the elevator, turn off the tension transferring system and allow the balancing weight to bounce back using elasticity of the cable or other mechanism. So now the balancing weight is on the same position while the elevator has moved upward.The process is then repeat itself until the elevator reach its uppermost point; and when elevator is going downward, we simply turned off the tension transferring system. Thus we had extract the energy from gravitational field to move the elevator by clever engineering, we could probably saved 70%-80% of the energy cost of the elevator.

靜態重力電梯主意(2)

上次提到,要盡量利用平衡重的重量為電梯上升的動力,但又不想在電梯下降時付回剛賺到重力位能,除了把平衡重的重量改成可變的思路外,還有一個改變平衡重和電梯如何互動的思路,此思路如何具體實現?

首先,一般的設計都是把平衡重和電梯直接連在一起,以便平衡重的重量和電梯的重量直接互動,其實要平衡重的重量可以和電梯的重量發生作用,兩者不一定直接連起來,只要有適當的方法把平衡重的重量傳過去,有這樣一個媒介的好處是我們可以控制兩者的重力如何互動,其中一個媒介/方法是利用發電機發電時產生的阻力效應來把平衡重的重量在有需要時傳到電梯,而當沒有需要時,這個重力傳遞系統可以關掉。但是,雖然可以控制重力的傳遞,卻無法克服最基本的一個問題,就是除非平衡重可以像上次水力升降機的設計一樣可升可降,否則下降了的平衡重一樣要同樣的位能來補償,除非有一個辨法令平衡重不用升降也可以發揮它的重力作用,於是靜態(或相對靜態)的平衡重居然用自身的重量可以令電梯升降。

我的想法是把電梯上升及下降時的動作分成萬千個分割的片段,假設平衡重是比電梯重近百部,如此當電梯要上升時,我們可以用重力傳遞系統把平衡重的重力間竭傳送到電梯上,電梯每上升一格後便被不可逆的齒輪卡住,而由電梯上升而產生的反作用力則會令平衡重有一剎那的躍動,但不久便會回複正常的位置。如此的過程不斷重複,直至電梯抵達最高層為止。而當電梯向下降時,運作方式就更簡單了,只要電梯的鋼纜夠長,我們要可以在此時令重力傳遞系統暫時失效,於是平衡重的重量為電梯上升提供的動能便不用任何方式來補償,達到充份利用地球重力場所提供的勢能的效果,節省能源自然是最環保。

My idea of hydrallic driven elavator

Now it is trendy to invent energy saving items, so I design this new elavator for solve the age old dilemma of balancing weight. The idea behind balancing weight is to increase the easiness of lifting an elavtor, at the price of paying back the same amount of potential energy it saved on its upward motion. Is there a way to save energy on upward motion without compensate in the downward motion?

There are several ways to approach this problem: First, we can made the weight of balancing weight variable in according to the direction of motion for the goal of energy saving; Second is to change the way which these two interact with each other. I save the later for another article. Now, how to change the weight of balancing weight so it would be heaviest when the elevator is going up and lightest when the elevator is going down?

Easy, by using the waste water pump out of each level; we now need a collection facilitate for collecting all the waste water from each apartment of each level; and also not a very complicate system to intelligently decide the amount of waste water used during each passage of elevator. Assume such a system is in place, then the balancing weight is actually a metallic cylinder allowing waste water to be collected. When the elevator is travelling upward, the rule of thumb is to increase the balancing weight as much as possible; and when the elevator is going back, the waste water in the cylinder is expelled through its opening in the bottom, which then going to the public sewage processing system.

How would such an idea to be implemented?

Idea: No waiting for customer in Chinese restaurant

In Sunday of Hong Kong, Chinese restaurant are often crowded with customer waiting for their seat, since it is a cheap way to kill time. However, many of us aren't patient person and can't stand the wait in the seats outside the restaurant while they don't want to lose the seat. Is there a solution for this dilemma?

I thereby propose my conceptual innovation here:

It work as simple as a software program, every time when a customer arrive, his /her phone, name and number of seats s/he will occupied, the software would assigned a customer number and printed a hardcopy as evidence. As seats become available, the waitor operate this system would click a button to increase the customer number in the database, it would then alter the customer through SMS via VoIP software like Skype or Ekiga with a pre-recorded message, or through a recorded voice message to phone in the database. Since it take time for customer to arrive to the restaurant, the system could held the seat for half hour(or any amount of time set in the software). Thus now customer no longer need to wait in front of restaurant.

水力升降機小主意

環保潮流,萬事萬物都以節能為尚,但是現在的升降機一點都不服膺於這原則,因為聰明的工程師為了省回升降機上升時的能量,於是便加上了平衡重來作相反方向的運動,不過省回的能量卻在升降機下降時被浪費掉。關鍵是有升必有降,只要平衡重的重量不變,節能是絕對不可能的。
有幾個可以解決此難題的思路,一是由平衡重如何和升降機的重量互動箸手,另一是相當簡單的把平衡重的重量由不變改成可變,順騰摸瓜,要節能的話當然是想辦法令升降機在上升時的平衡重變成最重,同理,升降機在下降時的平衡重變成最輕。如何令升降機在上升時的平衡重變成最重,升降機在下降時的平衡重變成最輕呢?其中一個辦法是先把平衡重變成一大容器,然後利用每戶每天生產出來的污水,每當升降機要向上時,就把平衡容器注滿污水,然後當升降機要下降時,就把平衡容器盛的水放走到污水渠,如此我們是巧妙利用了污水的重力勢能作能源來推動升降機作升降任務,它本身只消秏少量的電來作通風和照明(可從太陽能取得),絕對合乎環保的原則,如果全世界都使用的話,每年將減低數以千噸溫室氣體的排放。剩下唯一的技術難關,是如何有效控制污水的收集及排放,而污水收集又如何儲藏才能避免衛生問題?要是污水不足的話,在雨帶地方可收集雨水作同一用途。
此發明應用了蔣振寧抽取地心吸力的原理,本人為開發群組其中一成員,願意和任何人(除了曾拿我主意去註冊專利的他)合作開發!

小主意:茶樓等位提示器

上茶樓吃一盅兩件是香港平民常見的娛樂,既便宜又可消耗時間,但是在周未或假日,茶樓往往大排長龍,想光顧的客人都要在茶樓門外苦侯不知幾多時間,我相信很少香港人會有閒情逸緻去「享受」等位的過程,就算是閒暇也想在茶樓內享受,而不是在門口等待。因此我提出的小主意/發明就是為了省顧客的時間而設。它會在客人可入座時利用短訊通知他/她,於是他/她便可以在附近閒逛或者休息,而不用呆坐直到可入座為止。
它的運作原理很簡單,一如平時,當客人要求位子時可向待應登記,他/她就會把客人的名字、手提電話及人數等輸入此裝置/系統(由人數去分大中小三種枱),並由系統自動生產一號碼,並印二張存底,一張給客人,一張留在茶樓。而每次當有新位子時,由待應按不同的製以增加大中小枱目前的輪侯號碼,系統/裝置每次均依存在資料庫的號碼順序尋找對應的客人名字及自動透過互聯網向客人的手機發一提示短訊,或者用skype之類軟件向此電話發一段早已預錄的訊息,提醒客人是時侯開始光顧。同時,茶樓/餐廳考慮到客人未必可即時抵達,便可保留此位子如半小時。如此一來,定可令食肆的顧客賓至如歸,客似雲來!

好古怪及無聊的小主意(１)

(又是另一個本來可以伸請專利的主意來獻世,自己得不到任何益處,唯一最欣慰這點是看到有人善用我的主意,彷如看到自己的孩子快高長大,造福社會。)

小時侯的體育鞋的底常常穿,再入石仔,走路時不舒服。
不過現在想來其實是有益身心健康,特別對長者及行動不便者有複康及行氣活血之效,做法就是在穿鞋時在內隴放入石仔(或小型的波子),如此只要你不怕痛,你就可以邊行街邊做腳底按摩,不知不覺間改善自己的血液循環,而不用專程搭車上深圳去做腳按摩。不過要小心選擇石頭,怕痛的人可選表面平滑一點的石頭,如想效果更好及更快,則不妨選一些表面尖一點的,可謂苦口良藥;另外,要注意不要連續多用過一星期,最好是兩三天後停用一天,以免腳下的皮膚硬化。

環保數學?

環保數學不是我原創的,記得曾在多年前的比賽時已有中學生提出在數學科中加環境保護相關的項目/教材,如在教正比例時計一下當香港成為曾蔭權心目中的一千萬人口大都會時每天排出的污水有多少,每天生產了多少二氧化碳,環保設施又要增加幾多,因此庫房額外多支出多少等等,我以為可以再進一步,因為據認知心理學的研究,人類似乎是天生難於理解指數式增進,所以與其還是背誦計算機可應付得焯焊有餘的９*９乘數表,不如背９^９的指數表來補償人類天生的認知缺陷, 斧底抽薪地學習環保意識。因為此指數表的數位太大,所以建議小學時只背到所有結果為５位數範圍以內的指數,而中學畢業前要完成９位以內所有的指數。

My idea on environmental friendly Mathematics

That is actually nothing new, using examples from environmental issue like pollution, growth of population, depletion of Ozone in Mathematics textbook is already an adopted idea. My thought is related to a more fundamental change in the syllabus of Mathematics: It was suggested human mind has difficulty to contemplate exponential growth, which maybe a root cause for the lack of awareness of the issue of population explosion. So my suggestion is instead of memorize the multiplication table of from 1*1 to 10*10, student should learn to memorize the index table from 1^1 to 10^10 (For all the result within 5 digits in Primary School, and 10 digits when graduate from Secondary School). In this way, student would built a sense of how growth of population affect the Earth from Primary school; moreover, what we master when we memorize the multiplication table is essentially doing the arithmetic operation of addition in our head, but not doing multiplication . Who can push it to the syllabus around the world?

A strange idea on Chinese input method

This is indeed an very odd idea, because this idea is not about simplify the input of Chinese character, rather it has an the opposite effect of lengthen the process. Why is it necessary?

My thought is that when we have been input Chinese using certain method for too long, we essentially programmed our neurons much like reflex action. Just like we have forgotten how to type in keyboard, the process has become largely unconscious automation.

The advantage of this mechanization of Chinese input free us from the repeating routine which involve little intelligence, and theoretically we thus have more neurological-computational resource to handle the higher level processing like think what to write, the effect and intend of the writing, the philosophy of writing... etc. However, on the other end, it may create an effect which one is essentially forgetting what s/he type, thus may result in unable to write Chinese without computer keyboard.

My solution is to make a dynamic realignment of the Chinese character everytime the user utilize this method for the same set of input. Thus s/he can't rely on rote memory of the location of the Chinese character, the user pay attention to the character s/he pick since it would appear in different location each time. So the user at least are trained to recognize the Chinese character, strengthen existing neurological representation of the particular Chinese character. Then when the user is face with the situation which s/he have to user another Chinese input method, s/he will adapt to it more readily compare to those who only memorize the associated keystroke of that Chinese character.

Who can implement such a strange idea?

How to make a rope that won't swing by strong wind?

With a rope by itself, it would be impossible to do so. To make something unaffected by a strong force in anything, there are two directions to go:
A. When the force is absorbed and transformed into thermal energy, i.e. the uniqueness of directionality of the external force is destroyed by the internal structure of the rope;
B. When we could use the force to turn against itself, i.e. when we can led the force to interact with the rope to achieve a self-contradiction, then logically and physically the force can achieve nothing.
Since A has been discussed throughly in any ordinary level material Physics textbook, so I am more interested in discussing B. To produce a self contradiction, a rope by itself is not suffice to do so. We need two columns that is fixated on the group; then we make a knot on one side column, and we fix the rope from left side of one column to right side of another column so it pass each location only once.
Now when wind hit the rope in any direction, it would attempt to extend the part of the rope that is nearer to the source of wind. So because of this construction, when it attempt to extend the rope on one side then the other side would react by contract (since the rope has limited extensibility.) However, because the two parts are parallel to each other(and perpendicular to the direction of wind), then the force goes into extending the part of the rope closer to the source of wind also attempted to extend the part of the rope that is further from the source of wind. Therefore, through this construction, the force of wind is led to acting against itself in the rope, thus however the strength of the wind, the rope will never swing.
Can we extend this idea into areas other than Physics?

如果明天是普選,你會不會投票?

我指的是不支持香港現在實行普選的人!

My extention of this Prophecy

My father’s thought on this prophecy:

1. Obama win the US election;
2. White supremacist group assassinate Obama;
3. The assassin is caught but release, Africa American charge US government for conspiracy;
4. Some Black dominated States seeking independence from USA, Federal Court denies, those States taking up arms.
5. Civil War in USA!