My commentary on an Overunity Generator design

While I was studying those designs here, I discover there are fatal technicalities that the inventor may have overlooked. Namely, that we can NOT directly connect electromagnetic coil from the magnet of lower layer, otherwise there will be situations which the Back EMF from one layer cancel the EMF produced by retardation effect of coil wired on magnet, therefore create an unnecessary constraint on the timing of rotation of layer. My suggestion is to use capacitor and electrical circuit as a buffer to store the electrical energy produce by retardation of magnet of lower layer, and then it would only magnetize the upper layer’s electromagnetic oil at suitable time.

Euler's Back EMF Generator

Euler’s Generator.

另類太極設計

外圍定子由定距磁石組成,轉子是由至少一對共四線圈組成,
四線圈共分前後兩組均是固定不變地以極面對磁石的磁極,
前組可作一範圍之前後在棒上的前方作直線移動,後組是固定不變;
兩組均是附着公轉軸延伸出來的直棒,四線圈及磁石對稱分佈;
有特別設計之公轉軸,目的在於可以由軸發力轉動,
但不會直接承受對軸芯的壓迫力。
後組線圈目的在於把所有前組線圈形成的反轉動力距化為對軸芯的壓迫力,
由於是兩組一同運作,同時產生相同大小但方向相反的壓迫力,互相抵消;
因此變成無阻力。

缺點在於只是減去阻力,卻沒有化阻力為動力,優點在於可行性高。
如果把此設計加上太極1,2,3,4,5的意念又如何?

An idea for today

http://eulertruthbible.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/an-experiment/
在該實驗中,如果把二個磁石都加上coil又如何?
Further, if we connect these two coils with
A. 2n個線圈又如何?
B. 2n個線圈+magnet又如何?
(n 是正整數)

Euler’s 線圈是也?

Re: An idea for today

實驗:
比較: 1.單邊Magnet+線圈 和 2.兩邊磁石+coil
似乎明白點解了。
和我的宋添發設計又有點相似—原理一樣?
宋添發用相似的原理?

1. One-sided mutual depreciation
2. Total mutual depreciation

1. As the coil vibrate in the magnetic field with the magnet, the coil would vibrate in a resonance frequency eventually. If we place a coiled-magnet, the coil in magnet would reduce the magnetic field in the magnet, setting up a mutual-destructive interference in one direction of movement, the other direction of movement is not affected.

2. Now we have both magnet having the same presumably mutual-destructive interference, the effect in 1 would be multiplied? Or something different?

Follow up on invention: PDG by Parallel Path

This article refer to this design, there is a slight mistake, so the correct design for N-2 should be like this:

Be careful with 6 things:

1. The arrangement of magnets, you can guess it is N-S-N-S; the top magnet and bottom magnet should be the same polarity(N-N,S-S…)

2. If the volume of the IRON core within electromagnetic coil is 1, then the one in the middle should be 4.(That is the most critical part, all effect depend on this part)

3. That would be some tricks to do with rotating the rotor. Since there is iron and magnet, the rotation would NOT be smooth, it would be jerky. That would shorten the motor’s life cycle.
Do NOT use a motor DIRECTLY on the rotor, otherwise you can NOT see the Overunity effect. You need something like those in the bicycle so Motor can accelerate the rotor , but the rotor can move freely on its own.
i.e. The Rotor can move FASTER than the motor.
(If you don’t understand, say so and I will try to fetch a picture from the Internet. It is a very common device seen on bicycle so it move forward without human pedaling)

4. The longer the distance between the middle iron bar and two magnets, the weaker the Overunity effect. So it should be as close as possible.

5. Try with resistance-type loading first, induction-type later. I done many experiments with these, it usually work better on the former.

6. For testing, you can try with load connect to coils or close the circuit. The expected result should be higher than load, and the Overunity effect get BETTER. (i.e. The loading is on while the rotor is running faster and faster) Therefore if you doesn’t see a good effect with the small loading, then try with close the circuit.

Sorry, I done wrong calculation in the original proposal, I forgot that the coils would react to two magnets, i.e. the upper coil would be drag by lower magnet, and vice versa.
Because of the distance, assume it is 20%. So total drag force in N-2=2.4

also that the middle iron would interact with 2 magnet, producing net propelling force.
So total positive drag force=-4*.6*2=4.8

The net force forward=4.8-2.4=2.4
Amplification ratio= 2
(Notice that the Amplification ratio is fixed regardless of the efficiency which K.E. of magnet is ‘converted ‘to electrical energy of electromagnetic coil. I disagree with the name convert.)

Assume 8 magnet per round, and initial RPM=1,
The RPM at the last magnet of first circle= 256(if not exceed the Physical limit of Rotor)

C.O.P= Maximum physical output/initial input

With these 6 taken care of of we are good to go!!!

We call this design M-2(since there are two pair of magnet, and M refer to the name of builder.) Since the building of M-2, I am already dreaming of M-2*2 which has amplification of 16, even combining the idea from this one(Haven't know how yet…).

We can even design a car base on this, all we need is just a energy banks on the way to deposit the excessive electrical energy produced.

太極發電機設計

taichidesign

Ideas of Generator design 11/21/10

ideag1110

The detail process of electrical generation

(The following discussion assume no load is connected to the generator.)
1. Source of Magnet is moving relative to the coil.
The strength of Magnetic field experienced by the coil is changed by B=Original Strength of Magnetic field/Distance^2
2. Thus the EMF produced at the coil= -2*Original Strength of Magnetic field*Velocity of the Magnetic relative to the coil/Distance^3
(Negative sign indicate a repulsive poles)
*3. The voltage built up at the coil experience impedance(Magnetic inertia of the core), the electrical current is building up slowly.
Higher impedance— longer reaction , Lower impedance— faster reaction
4. The electrical current from the coil magnetize the core, the core become a Magnet with polarities opposing the change of external magnetic field.
5. An opposition force is experienced by the source of Magnet.

The above discussion is simplified with only 1 Magnet moving relative to 1 coil. In practice, we have most often m Magnets with n coils. We could thought of m independent cycle overlapping with each other in each of the n coils.(Assume that n coils doesn’t interact with each other.)

Although the process is generally following the above sequence. However, since 3 often take longest time. It follow that before when a coil has completed 1 cycle, another cycle already started. So the cycles doesn’t just overlapped by source of Magnetic field, but also by the timing of each cycle.

To prevent complicated interaction and overlapping of processes. I suppose traditional generator tend to have coils of impedance closely match with the velocity of the Magnetic source. Therefore for each generator it has an optimal speed for rotor with guarantee efficiency. When the generator is operating at a speed different from its optimal speed, the efficiency maybe lowered due to mismatch of cycles.

When impedance is too high compare to the rotational speed of the Magnet, it follow that the Magnet already departed from the coil before 3-5 happen.(Or 3-5 happen to produce a retarding force against another Magnet). The rotor thus experience little or no retarding force. (Therefore we could theoretically then any Generator into overunity by rotating it fast enough)
On the other end, if the impedance is too low compare to the rotational speed of the Magnet, 3-5 may took place before Magnet is closest to the coil. Therefore also reduce the retarding force against the Magnet. And if the impedance is a match of the rotational speed of the Magnet, the retarding force is maximum.

Theoretically, we could design a Generator to rotate at certain speed which we carefully program the cycles such that the drag force is minimized. Or maybe in some case, aiding the movement of rotor instead of retarding it.
(Clever audience should notice that this train of thought is how we can arrive at an overunity Generator.)