靜電的疑惑(2)

又是由年幼到現在也想不通的科學問題，小學時自然科學教導我們閃電是由於空氣在受熱澎漲而急速上升時，因為激烈的撞擊而失去或多得了電子，累積在雲中，當遇到相反電荷的或當電動勢超過一定量就可以令不遠的物件產生相反的電場，因而放電，多餘電子重新來到欠缺電子的原子。只是我有兩個問題一直解決不了:

1. 因為激烈的撞擊而失去或多得了電子的水份已經不可以稱為水份子，化學性質應有所不同;

2. 因為激烈的撞擊而失去或多得了電子的水份子本身已有了靜電場，當然最直接的就是吸引空氣中帶相反電荷的離子而放電中和一番，何以非要累積在不帶電的雲不可?

3. 一雲如果是中和的被因為激烈的撞擊而失去或多得了電子的水份子吸附也算合理，但是隨箸依附的帶電水份子愈來愈多，則其他的帶電水份子要依附在這片雲所需的動能愈來愈高，它的動能來自哪裏?

4. 另外，隨箸依附在雲中的帶電水份子愈來愈多，靜電力的同性相斥作用力怎不會比靠氫鍵來接合的不帶電水份子的結合力更強，何以雲能夠累積如此多的帶電水份子而不被撕裂成一小片?

靜電的疑惑(1)

小學時人人都學過什麼叫摩擦生電，理論是當劇烈摩擦時，其中一方的原子的電子被撞離了軌道，於是形成了兩方都是電子和質子數量不相等，結果產生靜電。我一直以來不明白的是，如果真的是一方把另外一方的電子撞離軌道，除非它被空氣中的原子吸收，否則這粒脫軌電子最方便的去處就是另一方的表面，所以理論上應是一方的電子比質子數量多，而另一方就自然電子比質子數量小，由此推導出一方應是正極而另一方是負極，因而兩物件相互吸引。但是我的印象告訴我，似乎實驗出來的結果就是兩物件相互排斥，即兩方面都是同時電子比質子數量小或電子比質子數量多，這麼多餘的電子豈不是無中生有或者無端端消失了嗎?

所以﹐我提議用科學實驗去分辦兩個假說，就是到底兩物件劇烈摩擦生產/毀滅電子而產生靜電現象，還是兩物件劇烈摩擦時的電子被空氣原子吸收而產生靜電現象。我想到的方法是用吸塵機遲遲抽掉一玻璃箱之空氣，在不同的氣壓把兩物件用相同的力量摩擦，看看產生出來的靜電有沒有什麼不同﹐理論上，如果我的假說有根據﹐則隨箸真空的程度愈高﹐靜電量愈來愈少。

熱力傳導受不受地心吸力的影響?

當然受地心吸力的影響:
比較以下3個例子,
1.半杯熱水在底,半杯冷水添在面;
2.半杯冷水在底,半杯熱水添在面;
3.半杯熱水添在左,半杯冷水添在右;

時間由快至慢排列:１,３,２.
何解１快過２?
因為在冷水較重,熱水較輕,所以當冷水放在底而熱水放在面時,受地心吸力的作用,熱冷水都傾向保留自己的位置;但是當當冷水放在面而熱水放在底時,受地心吸力的作用,熱水向上流,冷水向下流,因此地心吸力協助了形成對流,方便熱傳導。
水的分別或者會較少,因為水的比熱容較大,但是用比熱容較少的流體分別會更明顯,而地心吸力亦是氣流動力的一部份。

An strange idea for saving electrical energy

It follow from my very strange idea that if a stream of electricity is never allow to reach from positive terminal to negative terminal, then the electrical energy contained in the electrical current is never consumed. Then we can apply this idea in any city to save electrical energy immediately.

The general idea is very simple, this device would have three components:
A. Electrical circuit to detect the voltage of capacitor and switch between two sources of electrical energy: External/Internal, in according to the result.
B. A capacitor that is capable of storing all electrical energy needed for one instance of operation of all electrical energy consumption.
C. Electrical current stabilizer to regulate the electrical energy discharged from B.
*D. Electrical appliance that require the consumption of electrical energy.

The iteration:
1. When the component B is detected to be empty, then component A switch the electrical energy source from capacitor to external supply.
2. The electrical energy from external supply enter the component B via D until B is fully charged.
3. Component A switch the supply from external to internal.
4. Component B is then discharging through component C to component D. Thus component B is emptied.

Theoretically, since we use electrical energy from external source half of the time, therefore we save about 50% of electrical energy without affecting the operation of electrical appliances at all. However, since we require electrical energy to operate this invention, therefore we presume it is less efficient, thus we expect we could save 40% of electrical energy. The technical challenge is we need an capacitor that is capable of storing Million Joule of electrical energy, I believe it is easier to do that in a city as a whole than implemented by individual household.

More direction for developing Euler's Coil Technology

One more implementation of Euler’s Coil Technology is instead of using one SOURCE electromagnetic coil in one setup, we could use more than one SOURCE electromagnetic coil. Euler’s Coil Technology could be phased as ‘What happen if we have four electromagnetic coils, and each electromagnetic coil is given a variation of electrical current as if we are using one SOURCE electromagnetic coil in original Euler’s Coil setup?’
We could infer given that the result of mutual induction of this alignment of electromagnetic coils would be identical to the variation of electromagnetic field of individual when only one SOURCE electromagnetic coil is given a variation. Certainly, any variations of electromagnetic field of one electromagnetic coil must be coherent other variations of electromagnetic field of any other electromagnetic coil, otherwise the mutual inductance would rise to infinite and no electrical current could flow in any one electromagnetic coil. Therefore, if we intentionally create variations of electromagnetic field of individual electromagnetic coils that is identical to what we expect when one SOURCE electromagnetic coil, we should expect individual electromagnetic coil would ‘encourage’ this variation of electromagnetic field by adding more electrical energy into each individual electromagnetic coil.

My understanding of electrical energy from Battery

The Theoritical Base for Overunity Research

Overunity energy Research: Energy is created and destroyed in the process of generation and usage. Thus there are potentially unlimited source of energy, energy crisis is unnecessary.

Current Energy Research: Energy is not created or destroyed, just converted from one form to another. Therefore it is unavoidable to have energy crisis.(Since we inevitably spent more energy than what we can produce from nonrenewable source, even if it is fission energy.) There are no solution to this problem.

Updated 2008.07.01: Capitalist economy dictate that we MUST have the first one for unlimited economic growth.

free Electrical energy from the Electrical Field?

There are an often ignored way of electrical generation apart from the method of my last article The General theory of Electrical Generation: Directly extracting electrical energy from the electrical field. Applying the spring analogy I have from that article, to extract energy from electrical field in the form of electricity, we need to apply electromagnetic stress on an unbreakable Magnetic spring(Permanent Magnet); and similarly we can extract electrical energy directly from electrical field by apply electrical stress on permanent source of electrical field. How so? By taking electrical energy from electrical wire between two poles like this: energy_from_electrical_field.

Theoretically, the two insulator insulate with the charged object acting as the poles, to prevent the losing of electrical charge to the air. The pair of them as the spring to pump electrical charges in the metallic wire in between them from one pole to another. Since it is impossible to depreciate the electrical energy keep in the insulators, therefore we could theoretically get as much electrical energy from the electrical wire acting as the medium. And that is within the scope of classical electromagnetism.