How does this Overunity device works?

We are using this Overunity Device already approved by Japanese Patenting Authority as an example to illustrate a few simple points:

The purpose of each component are as such:
A. The pair of Permanent Magnet, controlled by an independent rotor, rotating on its own accord to produce a change of magnetic field experienced by the generating coil in the middle.
B. The rotor of Permanent magnets, is to produce change of magnetic field experienced by the generating coil in the middle in combination with 1.
C. The generating coils are responsible for translating the change of magnetic field experienced by itself to electrical voltage and current via Lenz’s Law. It is also responsible for producing magnetic current that has magnetic polarity which is opposite to the other generating coil(s) in the other sides, for the sake of nullifying the effect of the other magnetic current from other generating coil.
D. The ferromagnetic material responsible for creating a tunnel which magnetic current from other generating coils to merge and nullify each other’s effect.
(I ignore the description of other less important components here.)

Process:
1. Rotor of Permanent Magnet rotate, together with the presence of Permanent Magnet to produce an effect of change of Magnetic field experienced by the generating coils. The rotation of components A is such that a pair of them are always in opposite polarity.

2. The generating coils in the middle experienced the change of magnetic field created by Process 1, and it response to it according to Lenz’s Law, thus electrical current and magnetic current is produced. However,
since there are pairs of generating coil, and each of them always generate a magnetic current that is of opposite polarity of each other.

3. The magnetic currents produced by generating coils are merge together in component D. Since they are of opposite magnetic polarity and of the same strength, therefore the effect is a complete cancellation of the effect of magnetic currents as a whole in the invention. There are no net magnetization of the component D.

4. Since there are no net magnetic currents flowing in the component D, thus Inductance of each generating coil is only equal to the inductance of the coils itself without the iron core. We could effectively ignore the presence of component D in this process. Therefore each component C would produce a much weaker magnetic field resisting the approach of component A of the electrical current it produce.

5. Nevertheless, component A would experience a small resisting force due to Lenz’s effect of component C, causing it to slow down. However, the effect of that is minimal consider the amount of electrical current component C produce.

Technicalities:
1. The permeability of component D must be carefully chosen to match the desired amount of electrical current produced. If it is lower than what expected of the electrical current produced by component C, the efficiency of the invention as a whole would be lowered.
2. The distance between the pair of component C should be minimize to reduce the lost of magnetic currents(thus reduce the effect of cancellation intended by this invention.) We could use Magnetic field detector to check the magnetic field leakage around the invention to achieve this object. Nevertheless, we expect the cancellation effect of magnetic current is always less than 100%.
(I ignore other trivialities of electrical generator design here.)

From the perspective of energy:
1. Kinetic energy of Component A cause Electrical energy to be formed at component C.
2. The Magnetic energy of component C are canceled in component D and C.
3. Thus the effect of Lenz’s Law of component C is largely minimized, the Kinetic energy of component B is reduced by an amount much lesser than what is expected of the amount of electrical current in traditional
electrical generation process.
i.e. Kinetic energy dissipated in A« Electrical energy generated in C.
Excessive energy is resulted in running the component A with lesser amount of electrical energy. To further improve its effect, we could let the component A run for a while with component C switch off. The load of component C is carefully monitor so it is not producing a retarding force large enough to disturb the rotation of component A.

Compare to traditional electrical generation process:
1. Kinetic energy of Component A caused Electrical energy of component C.
2. The Electrical energy of component C come along with magnetic energy of component D.
3. Magnetic energy of component D has the effect of retarding the motion of component B, i.e. the Kinetic energy of component B is largely dissipated.

i.e. Kinetic energy dissipated in A≥ Electrical energy generated in C.